Natale A, Zimerman L, Tomassoni G, Newby K, Leonelli F, Fanelli R, Beheiry S, Pisano E
University of Kentucky Lexington, 40536-0284, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Nov;22(11):1634-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00383.x.
We assess whether AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation after discontinuation of effective rate-control medical therapy for chronic atrial fibrillation had a positive impact on quality of life and exercise performance. To assess the possibility of a placebo effect following pacemaker implantation, the study included three groups of patients. Group 1 underwent an echocardiogram, treadmill exercise, and quality of life measurement 1 month prior to and 6 months following AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation associated with discontinuation of rate-control medications. Group 2 underwent AV node ablation and pacemaker implantation without discontinuation of antiarrhythmic rate-control drugs. Group 3 underwent pacemaker implantation without performing AV node ablation and continuing rate-control medical therapy. At the 1- and 6-month evaluation, the patients in group 1 showed a significant improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, and activity scores. The exercise duration and the maximal VO2 consumption, however, did not change significantly. A slight improvement of the quality of life and physical activity scores was observed in the group undergoing AV node ablation without withdrawal of medications. However, no significant changes were observed in the group receiving only the pacemaker without modification of medical therapy and with intact AV node conduction. In conclusion, in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, discontinuation of effective rate-control medical therapy followed by AV node ablation and permanent pacing appeared to improve quality of life and activity scores despite no change in exercise duration. The improvement observed does not seem to reflect a placebo effect.
我们评估了在停止对慢性房颤进行有效的心率控制药物治疗后进行房室结消融和起搏器植入术是否对生活质量和运动表现有积极影响。为了评估起搏器植入后安慰剂效应的可能性,该研究纳入了三组患者。第一组患者在与停用心率控制药物相关的房室结消融和起搏器植入术前1个月及术后6个月接受了超声心动图、跑步机运动和生活质量测量。第二组患者在不停用抗心律失常心率控制药物的情况下进行了房室结消融和起搏器植入术。第三组患者在未进行房室结消融且继续进行心率控制药物治疗的情况下接受了起搏器植入术。在1个月和6个月的评估中,第一组患者的左心室射血分数、生活质量和活动评分有显著改善。然而,运动持续时间和最大摄氧量没有显著变化。在未停用药物进行房室结消融的组中,生活质量和身体活动评分略有改善。然而,在仅接受起搏器植入而未改变药物治疗且房室结传导完整的组中未观察到显著变化。总之,对于慢性房颤患者,在停止有效的心率控制药物治疗后进行房室结消融和永久起搏似乎可以改善生活质量和活动评分,尽管运动持续时间没有变化。观察到的改善似乎并不反映安慰剂效应。