Kay G N, Ellenbogen K A, Giudici M, Redfield M M, Jenkins L S, Mianulli M, Wilkoff B
Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Jun;2(2):121-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1009795330454.
The Ablate and Pace Trial (APT) prospectively assessed the effects of catheter ablation of the AV conduction system and permanent pacemaker implantation on health-related quality of life, survival, exercise capacity, and ventricular function in 156 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
All patients referred for catheter ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation because of medically-refractory atrial fibrillation at 16 centers were screened for enrollment in a prospective registry. Baseline assessment prior to ablation included measurement of quality of life, including the Health Status Questionnaire, the Quality of Life Index and the Symptom Checklist: Frequency and Severity. Exercise capacity was assessed with metabolic treadmill exercise testing and ventricular function was quantitated with echocardiography. The quality of life instruments, exercise capacity, and echocardiography were repeated at 3 and 12 months after catheter ablation.
The APT population included 90 men and 66 women (66.1 +/- 11.5 years of age) with either chronic (n = 70), recurrent (n = 31), or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 55). Structural heart disease was present in 78.2% of patients. Successful ablation of AV conduction was achieved in 155 of 156 patients (99.4%). Survival at 1 year was 85.3%, with 5 of 23 deaths being sudden cardiac deaths. Survival over the first year of follow-up was significantly lower for patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.45 (0.73) than for patients with a LVEF > or = 0.45 (0.88, p = 0.03). The NYHA functional class improved from 2.1 at baseline to 1.8 at 3 months and 1.9 at 12 months of followup (p = 0.0001). Significant improvement in quality of life scores were noted for all 8 subscales of the Health Status Questionnaire, for the overall rating of the Quality of Life Index, the Health and Function subscales; Arrhythmia-related symptoms were markedly reduced as measured by the Symptom Checklist: Frequency and Severity scale. The mean LVEF improved from 0.50 +/- 0.20 at baseline to 0.54 +/- 0.20 at 3 months (p = 0.03). The LVEF 12 months after ablation was 0.52 +/- 0.20, not statistically different from baseline. Individuals with reduced systolic function at baseline had the greatest improvement, from LVEF 0.31 +/- 0.20 at baseline to 0.41 +/- 0.20 at 3 months and 0.41 +/- 0.30 at 12 months (p = 0.0001). There were no significant changes in treadmill exercise duration (10.0 +/- 4.3 min at baseline and 11.6 +/- 3.6 min at 12 months) or VO2max (1467 +/- 681 ml O2 min baseline and 1629 +/- 739 ml O2 min at 12 months).
Catheter ablation of the AV conduction system and permanent pacemaker implantation were associated with improved quality of life and left ventricular function in this population of highly symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to medical therapy.
房室传导系统消融与起搏试验(APT)前瞻性评估了导管消融房室传导系统及植入永久性起搏器对156例症状性房颤患者健康相关生活质量、生存率、运动能力及心室功能的影响。
在16个中心,所有因药物难治性房颤而接受导管消融及永久性起搏器植入的患者均被筛选纳入前瞻性登记研究。消融前的基线评估包括生活质量测量,包括健康状况问卷、生活质量指数及症状清单:频率与严重程度。运动能力通过代谢平板运动试验评估,心室功能通过超声心动图定量分析。生活质量量表、运动能力及超声心动图在导管消融后3个月和12个月重复测量。
APT研究人群包括90例男性和66例女性(年龄66.1±11.5岁),患有慢性房颤(n = 70)、复发性房颤(n = 31)或阵发性房颤(n = 55)。78.2%的患者存在结构性心脏病。156例患者中有155例(99.4%)成功消融房室传导。1年生存率为85.3%,23例死亡中有5例为心源性猝死。基线左心室射血分数(LVEF)<0.45的患者随访第1年的生存率(0.73)显著低于LVEF≥0.45的患者(0.88,p = 0.03)。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级从基线时的2.1改善至随访3个月时的1.8及12个月时的1.9(p = 0.0001)。健康状况问卷的所有8个分量表、生活质量指数的总体评分、健康与功能分量表的生活质量评分均有显著改善;通过症状清单:频率与严重程度量表测量,与心律失常相关的症状明显减轻。平均LVEF从基线时的0.50±0.20改善至3个月时的0.54±0.20(p = 0.03)。消融后12个月的LVEF为0.52±0.20,与基线无统计学差异。基线时收缩功能降低的个体改善最大,从基线时的LVEF 0.31±0.20改善至3个月时的0.41±0.20及12个月时的0.41±0.30(p = 0.0001)。平板运动持续时间(基线时10.0±4.3分钟,12个月时11.6±3.6分钟)或最大摄氧量(基线时1467±681 ml O2/分钟,12个月时1629±739 ml O2/分钟)无显著变化。
对于这群药物治疗难治性的高度症状性房颤患者,导管消融房室传导系统及植入永久性起搏器与生活质量改善及左心室功能改善相关。