Kosmowski Kazimierz T
a Technical University of Gdańsk , Poland.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 1995 Jan;1(3):276-293. doi: 10.1080/10803548.1995.11076325.
This article addresses methodological issues of the human reliability analysis (HRA) in the context of probabilistic safety studies. Several conventional HRA techniques, more often used for the evaluation of the human error probabilities (HEPs), have been classified. A taxonomy of human actions, failure events, and related factors is outlined in order to distinguish action phases, human behavior types and incorrect outputs (errors of omission or commission), error types (slips, lapses, and mistakes), and performance-shaping factors (PSFs) influencing the human performance. A tree is proposed to facilitate the selection of a specific method for the evaluation of human reliability with regard to attributes of the situation analyzed. A software system based on the expert system technology to facilitate and document PSA and HRA is outlined. At the end of the article some research challenges in the domain are discussed.
本文探讨了概率安全研究背景下的人因可靠性分析(HRA)方法学问题。对几种常用于评估人因失误概率(HEPs)的传统HRA技术进行了分类。概述了人类行为、失效事件及相关因素的分类法,以区分行动阶段、人类行为类型和错误输出(遗漏或执行错误)、错误类型(失误、疏忽和差错)以及影响人类绩效的绩效塑造因素(PSF)。提出了一棵树,以便根据所分析情况的属性来选择评估人因可靠性的特定方法。概述了一个基于专家系统技术的软件系统,以促进概率安全评估(PSA)和HRA并记录相关文档。文章结尾讨论了该领域的一些研究挑战。