School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, People's Republic of China.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Sep;26(3):538-550. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1498655. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Human-induced accidents indicate the importance of human reliability analysis (HRA) in reducing and eliminating human errors, thus improving the reliability of human-machine systems. HRA takes both qualitative and quantitative approaches to determine the error of the operators and the contexts in which tasks are performed. To ensure that HRA results can objectively evaluate human error behaviors, the quantification of human error probability (HEP) is typically based on the qualitative analysis of human factors and task contexts and is further refined by performance shaping factors (PSFs). A good HEP process development includes the selection of PSFs, the evaluation of PSFs and the quantification strategy of HEP. A variety of HEP quantification analyses based on PSFs has been widely adopted in contemporary HRA studies. This work reviews three major quantification strategies used in HRA methods. Additionally, we generalize the modification of HEP with PSFs into a paradigm.
人为事故表明了人因可靠性分析(HRA)在减少和消除人为错误、提高人机系统可靠性方面的重要性。HRA 采用定性和定量方法来确定操作人员的错误和任务执行的情境。为了确保 HRA 结果能够客观地评估人为错误行为,人为差错概率(HEP)的量化通常基于人为因素和任务情境的定性分析,并通过绩效形成因素(PSFs)进一步细化。一个良好的 HEP 过程开发包括 PSFs 的选择、PSFs 的评估以及 HEP 的量化策略。基于 PSFs 的多种 HEP 量化分析已在当代 HRA 研究中得到广泛应用。本工作综述了 HRA 方法中使用的三种主要量化策略。此外,我们将 PSFs 对 HEP 的修正概括为一种范例。