Suppr超能文献

外周血祖细胞单采产物中表达CD34的造血细胞的半自动流式细胞术分析。

Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products.

作者信息

Gutensohn K, Carrero I, Krueger W, Kroeger N, Schäfer P, Luedemann K, Kuehnl P

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine/Transplantation Immunology, the Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1999 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):1220-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39111220.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells.

RESULTS

Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r2 = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r2 = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r2 = 0.96 with the German protocol and r2 = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.

摘要

背景

CD34+细胞的检测是外周血祖细胞单采产品质量控制中最重要的步骤。为此,采用了流式细胞术。最近,一种新的检测试剂盒被引入用于计数表达CD34的细胞,并结合了用于数据采集和分析半自动化的软件支持。

研究设计与方法

本研究评估了ProCOUNT试剂盒。对39例血液肿瘤疾病患者外周血祖细胞单采产品获得的90份样本进行了分析。数据采集和分析使用ProCOUNT软件。根据国际血液治疗与移植工程学会(ISHAGE)指南和德国分析表达CD34细胞的参考方案,通过平行测量进行数据比较。

结果

德国技术与ISHAGE技术的相关性极佳(r2 = 0.99)。ProCOUNT分析与德国方案的初始相关系数为r2 = 0.89。在90次ProCOUNT分析中的21次(23.3%)中,ProCOUNT软件出现了警告信息。在用CellQUEST软件对这些数据进行人工重新评估后,与德国方案的相关性为r2 = 0.96,与ISHAGE分析的相关性为r2 = 0.97。方差分析显示ProCOUNT技术与ISHAGE技术之间存在显著差异(p<0.05),ProCOUNT技术与德国方案之间也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。ISHAGE与德国方案之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.19)。

结论

用于半自动化数据采集和分析的ProCOUNT试剂盒及软件代表了外周血祖细胞单采产品中CD34细胞定量标准化的进一步进展。然而,软件警告的发生率较高,仍必须由经验丰富的人员进行分析或数据重新评估。因此,目前该试剂盒及软件相对于外周血祖细胞移植物中CD34+分析的现有指南没有明确优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验