Suppr超能文献

使用改良的干细胞计数试剂盒在两种不同流式细胞仪上同时进行CD34+和CD3+定量分析的比较。

Comparison of Simultaneous CD34+ and CD3+ Quantification with a Modified Stem Cell Enumeration Kit on Two Different Flow Cytometers.

作者信息

Strobel Julian, Hauck-Dlimi Barbara, Weisbach Volker, Eckstein Reinhold, Zingsem Juergen, Strasser Erwin

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2016 Nov 1;62(11):2213-2218. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160429.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quantification of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood stem cell apheresis is normally performed by single platform flow cytometric measurements according to the ISHAGE protocol. Peripheral blood stem cell concentrates (PBSC) produced by apheresis normally contain many T cells. Those T cells can be used for production of donor lymphocyte infusion doses, if abundant amounts of CD34+ cells have been collected. Therefore, it is of interest to know both the CD3+ and the CD34+ cell count of allogeneic PBSC. This is the first study comparing the performance of a modified ISHAGE protocol allowing additional quantification of CD3+ cells on two different flow cytometers, the FACSCalibur and the FACSVerse, respectively.

METHODS

CD45+ and CD34+ cell concentrations were measured using a standard and a modified ISHAGE protocol including CD3+ cell quantification on both machines. All cell concentrations were measured using a Trucount bead based stem cell enumeration kit. The FACSVerse machine can additionally be equipped with a sample volume sensor allowing cell quantification without using beads. The samples analysed were taken from granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cell apheresis procedures (pre- and post-apheresis, and apheresis concentrate).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in cell concentrations measured by the standard and modified ISHAGE protocol, regardless of which machine had been used when using bead quantification. No significant differences between the results of the two flow cytometers using the modified ISHAGE protocol were observed. Pearson´s correlation was always > 0.96, and regression coefficients were higher than 0.93. The only significant differences were observed between bead quantification and volume sensor quantification on the FACSVerse machine.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified ISHAGE protocol can effectively be used on both flow cytometers tested, especially if bead quantification is used.

摘要

背景

外周血干细胞单采中CD34+细胞的定量通常根据ISHAGE方案通过单平台流式细胞术测量来进行。单采产生的外周血干细胞浓缩物(PBSC)通常含有许多T细胞。如果已采集到大量CD34+细胞,这些T细胞可用于制备供体淋巴细胞输注剂量。因此,了解同种异体PBSC中CD3+和CD34+细胞计数很有意义。这是第一项比较改良ISHAGE方案在两种不同流式细胞仪(分别为FACSCalibur和FACSVerse)上进行CD3+细胞额外定量的性能的研究。

方法

使用标准和改良ISHAGE方案测量CD45+和CD34+细胞浓度,包括在两台仪器上对CD3+细胞进行定量。所有细胞浓度均使用基于Trucount微球的干细胞计数试剂盒进行测量。FACSVerse仪器还可配备样品体积传感器,无需使用微球即可进行细胞定量。分析的样本取自粒细胞集落刺激因子动员的外周血干细胞单采程序(单采前、单采后和单采浓缩物)。

结果

无论使用哪台仪器进行微球定量,标准和改良ISHAGE方案测量的细胞浓度均无显著差异。使用改良ISHAGE方案时,两台流式细胞仪的结果之间未观察到显著差异。Pearson相关性始终>0.96,回归系数高于0.93。唯一显著差异出现在FACSVerse仪器上的微球定量和体积传感器定量之间。

结论

改良ISHAGE方案可有效地用于所测试的两台流式细胞仪,尤其是在使用微球定量时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验