Welt S, Ritter G
Department of Medicine, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Semin Oncol. 1999 Dec;26(6):683-90.
Clinical research in antibody-based cancer therapy has been driven for many years by the prospect of identifying cell-surface antigens with sufficiently restrictive tissue expression patterns to allow the specific targeting of antibody to tumor tissue. Few if any such antibodies capable of targeting rapidly and efficiently to solid tumors have been identified. The main reasons for this are based on the inherent pharmacokinetics and physiology of IgG, the immunoglobulin G molecule. Factors that may limit targeting potential include accessibility of tumor antigen, and antibody affinity, molecular size, and metabolism. Immunoglobulins have evolved to optimally protect an organism from foreign invaders rather than to act as an efficient carrier molecule for therapeutic reagents. Despite these potential limitations, our growing understanding of the biologic and physiologic principles that underlie targeted therapy has led to the development of a generation of novel reagents and the first "positive" clinical trials. Recent strategies for therapeutic use of antibodies in colon cancer have focused on (I) unmodified mouse IgG; (2) immune globulin as carrier for targeted delivery of radioisotopes; toxins, and therapeutic molecules; (3) genetically engineered antibody constructs redesigned for specific uses; (4) humanized, nonimmunogenic IgG structures; and (5) novel antigen targets in tumors. Genetically engineered antibody constructs provide an exciting approach to address and subsequently overcome some of the problems identified for unmodified IgG. These new constructs should increase the dose fraction localized in tumors versus normal tissue and thereby improve the delivery capacity. In contrast, strategies such as immune-mediated cytotoxicity are less dependent on the quantitative difference between the antibody fraction localized in tumor and the nonlocalized fraction. Because antibodies, which direct host cytotoxic mechanisms, become activated in the tumor only when bound to antigen, one would not expect nonspecific toxic effects from nonlocalized antibody. The hypothesis that antibodies alone can destroy tumor tissue solely by directing immune cytotoxic mechanisms is just now being tested in clinical trials evaluating a new generation of humanized antibodies.
多年来,基于抗体的癌症治疗临床研究一直受到这样一种前景的推动,即识别具有足够限制性组织表达模式的细胞表面抗原,以使抗体能够特异性靶向肿瘤组织。能够快速有效地靶向实体瘤的此类抗体几乎没有被识别出来。主要原因基于免疫球蛋白G分子IgG固有的药代动力学和生理学特性。可能限制靶向潜力的因素包括肿瘤抗原的可及性、抗体亲和力、分子大小和代谢。免疫球蛋白的进化目的是最佳地保护生物体免受外来入侵者的侵害,而不是充当治疗试剂的有效载体分子。尽管存在这些潜在限制,但我们对靶向治疗背后的生物学和生理学原理的日益了解已导致新一代新型试剂的开发和首个“阳性”临床试验。结肠癌中抗体治疗应用的最新策略集中在:(1)未修饰的小鼠IgG;(2)作为放射性同位素、毒素和治疗分子靶向递送载体的免疫球蛋白;(3)为特定用途重新设计的基因工程抗体构建体;(4)人源化、无免疫原性的IgG结构;以及(5)肿瘤中的新型抗原靶点。基因工程抗体构建体为解决并随后克服未修饰IgG所发现的一些问题提供了一种令人兴奋的方法。这些新构建体应能增加肿瘤与正常组织中局部剂量的比例,从而提高递送能力。相比之下,免疫介导的细胞毒性等策略对肿瘤中局部抗体部分与非局部抗体部分之间的定量差异依赖性较小。因为直接介导宿主细胞毒性机制的抗体只有在与抗原结合时才会在肿瘤中被激活,所以不会预期非局部抗体产生非特异性毒性作用。仅通过介导免疫细胞毒性机制抗体就能单独破坏肿瘤组织的假说目前正在评估新一代人源化抗体的临床试验中进行检验。