Bodey B, Siegel S E, Kaiser H E
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Anticancer Res. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2):661-74.
Classical therapeutic modalities such as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy not only fail to cure the majority of neoplastic disease, but their employment also leads to severe and debilitating side effects. The severe cancer related morbidity is often associated with the use of radiation and chemotherapy, making them less than ideal forms of therapy. Entirely new approaches to cancer therapy that are tumor cell directed, and specifically lethal to malignant cells and less toxic to normal tissues are being observed and developed, adhering to the old prayer "Destroy the diseased tissues, preserve the normal." Following the initial advances of Ehrlich, immunotherapy as a fourth modality of cancer therapy has already been developed and proven to be quite effective. Unfortunately, the cancer cell population is not a static entity, but rather a continually changing one. Considerable variations have been determined between individual malignant cells. Our strong belief is that it is necessary for present-day clinical oncologists to become aware of the existence of immunotherapy and learn how to employ it in order to improve the efficacy and decrease the side effects of modern cancer therapy. The development of hybridoma technology and the advances in monoclonal antibody (MoAB) production have revitalized the concept concerning the existence of cancer cell-targeted, specific "magic bullets". In addition, a variety of different agents (e.g. toxins, radionuclides, chemotherapeutic drugs) have been conjugated to mouse and human MoABs for selective delivery to cancer cells. Preclinical observations in athymic, nude mice using xenografted human cancers and mouse, anti-human MoABs were more than impressive and have lead to several clinical trials. Strategies for the employment of MoABs for cancer immunotherapy include: a) Immune reaction directed destruction of cancer cells; b) Interference with the growth and differentiation of malignant cells; c) Antigen epitope directed transport of anti-cancer agents to malignant cells; d) Anti-idiotype vaccines. Phase I studies have established the safety of employing immunoconjugates in humans, but the therapeutic results were less impressive. The clinical use of mouse MoABs in humans is limited due to the development of an anti-globulin immune response to the non-human immunoglobulins by the human host. Genetically engineered chimeric human-mouse MoABs have been developed by replacing the mouse Fc region with the human constant region. Moreover, the framework regions of variable domains of rodent immunoglobulins were also experimentally replaced by their human equivalents. These antibodies can also be designed to have specificities and effector functions determined by researchers, which may not appear in nature. The astonishing immunophenotypic (IP) heterogeneity of cancer cells, the different cytotoxic activity associated with the moiety linked to given MoABs, and mostly the impressive genetic modulation capabilities of cancer cells still remain as yet unsolved difficulties in the present immunotherapy of human cancer. Antibodies with two binding ends (bispecific antibodies) provide a great improvement in targeting cancer cells. The existing inadequacies of MoABs in immunotherapy may also be improved by increasing their efficiency with chemical coupling to various agents such as bacterial or plant toxins, radionuclides or cytotoxic drugs. In writing this review article, one of our main goals is to encourage further clinical research with the use of genetically engineered rodent MoABs and various immunoconjugates in the treatment of human cancer, as well as the combination of such immunotherapy with the three conventional modalities of therapy. Finally, we propose that MoAB-based immuno-therapy be accepted as a conventional form of therapy and employed not only in terminal cancer patients, but also, for instance, during and following surgical resection.
诸如手术、放疗和化疗等传统治疗方式不仅无法治愈大多数肿瘤疾病,而且其应用还会导致严重且使人虚弱的副作用。与癌症相关的严重发病率往往与放疗和化疗的使用有关,这使得它们成为不太理想的治疗方式。目前正在观察和开发全新的癌症治疗方法,这些方法以肿瘤细胞为导向,对恶性细胞具有特异性致死作用,而对正常组织毒性较小,遵循古老的祷词“破坏患病组织,保留正常组织”。继埃利希的初步进展之后,免疫疗法作为癌症治疗的第四种方式已经得到发展并被证明相当有效。不幸的是,癌细胞群体并非一个静态实体,而是一个不断变化的群体。已确定个体恶性细胞之间存在相当大的差异。我们坚信,当今的临床肿瘤学家有必要了解免疫疗法的存在,并学习如何应用它,以提高现代癌症治疗的疗效并减少副作用。杂交瘤技术的发展以及单克隆抗体(MoAB)生产的进步,使关于存在针对癌细胞的特异性“神奇子弹”的概念得以复兴。此外,多种不同的药物(如毒素、放射性核素、化疗药物)已与小鼠和人MoAB结合,用于选择性地递送至癌细胞。在无胸腺裸鼠中使用异种移植的人类癌症和小鼠抗人MoAB进行的临床前观察令人印象深刻,并已引发了多项临床试验。用于癌症免疫治疗的MoAB应用策略包括:a)免疫反应介导的癌细胞破坏;b)干扰恶性细胞的生长和分化;c)抗原表位介导的抗癌药物向恶性细胞的转运;d)抗独特型疫苗。I期研究已证实免疫偶联物在人体中的安全性,但治疗效果不太理想。由于人类宿主会对非人免疫球蛋白产生抗球蛋白免疫反应,小鼠MoAB在人体中的临床应用受到限制。通过用人恒定区替换小鼠Fc区,已开发出基因工程嵌合人 - 鼠MoAB。此外,啮齿动物免疫球蛋白可变区的框架区也通过实验被其人类等效物所取代。这些抗体还可被设计成具有研究人员确定的特异性和效应功能,这些功能可能在自然界中并不存在。癌细胞惊人的免疫表型(IP)异质性、与连接到特定MoAB的部分相关的不同细胞毒性活性,以及最重要的是癌细胞令人印象深刻的基因调节能力,仍然是目前人类癌症免疫治疗中尚未解决的难题。具有两个结合端的抗体(双特异性抗体)在靶向癌细胞方面有了很大改进。通过与各种药物如细菌或植物毒素、放射性核素或细胞毒性药物进行化学偶联来提高其效率,也可能改善MoAB在免疫治疗中现有的不足之处。在撰写这篇综述文章时,我们的主要目标之一是鼓励在使用基因工程啮齿动物MoAB和各种免疫偶联物治疗人类癌症方面进行进一步的临床研究,以及将这种免疫疗法与三种传统治疗方式相结合。最后,我们提议基于MoAB的免疫疗法应被接受为一种传统治疗方式,不仅应用于晚期癌症患者,而且例如在手术切除期间和之后也可应用。