• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向未来医生的“科学”“批判性思维”与“能力”。术语与概念综述。

'Science', 'critical thinking' and 'competence' for tomorrow's doctors. A review of terms and concepts.

作者信息

Maudsley G, Strivens J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2000 Jan;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00428.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00428.x
PMID:10607280
Abstract

CONTEXT

The recommendations of the General Medical Council in Tomorrow's Doctors renewed efforts to define core knowledge in undergraduate medical education. They also encouraged better use of the medical knowledge base in nurturing clinical judgement, critical thinking, and reflective practice. What then does the medical world understand by 'science', 'critical thinking' and 'competence', given the need to address both growth and uncertainty in the knowledge base and to practise evidence-based healthcare?

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

This review aims to outline the role of these key concepts in preparing undergraduate medical students for professional practice. Specifically, it explores: the fallibility of the 'scientific' foundations of medical practice; the role of understanding and thinking in undergraduate medical education; the need for a broad interpretation of competence and its relationship to transferability, and the nature of clinical judgement.

COMMENT

Tensions are seen to lie in the varying interpretations of clinical decision making as art or science; the varying characterizations of the nature of skilled performance in the novice, the competent and the expert practitioner, and the varying reactions to the acceptability and usefulness of 'meta-' concepts in capturing the essence of professional practice. Habitual self-conscious monitoring of mental processes may be the key to the flexible transfer and application of knowledge and skills across the contexts, characterized by uncertainty and incomplete evidence, for which doctors must be prepared.

摘要

背景

英国医学总会在《明日之医》中的建议再次推动了在本科医学教育中界定核心知识的努力。这些建议还鼓励在培养临床判断力、批判性思维和反思性实践中更好地利用医学知识库。鉴于需要应对知识库中的增长和不确定性并践行循证医疗,那么医学界对“科学”“批判性思维”和“能力”是如何理解的呢?

目的和目标

本综述旨在概述这些关键概念在使本科医学生为专业实践做好准备方面的作用。具体而言,它探讨了:医学实践“科学”基础的易错性;理解和思维在本科医学教育中的作用;对能力进行宽泛解释的必要性及其与可转移性的关系,以及临床判断力的本质。

评论

临床决策被视为艺术还是科学,对此存在不同解读;新手、有能力的从业者和专家型从业者的技能表现本质有不同描述;对于“元”概念在把握专业实践本质方面的可接受性和有用性也有不同反应,这些方面都存在紧张关系。习惯性地对心理过程进行自我意识监测可能是在不确定性和证据不完整的情况下灵活转移和应用知识与技能的关键,而医生必须为此做好准备。

相似文献

1
'Science', 'critical thinking' and 'competence' for tomorrow's doctors. A review of terms and concepts.面向未来医生的“科学”“批判性思维”与“能力”。术语与概念综述。
Med Educ. 2000 Jan;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00428.x.
2
Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students.为医学生提升专业知识、体验式学习和批判性思维能力。
Med Educ. 2000 Jul;34(7):535-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00632.x.
3
Prescribing and the core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors: BPS curriculum in clinical pharmacology and prescribing for medical students.为明天的医生制定处方和核心课程:医学生临床药理学和处方的 BPS 课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):644-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04186.x.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
The Minimum Competences in Non-surgical Oncology that Medical Students Need to Acquire in Order to be Safe Foundation Year 1 (F1) Doctors: A Delphi Survey.医学生为成为安全的第一年基础培训医生(F1)所需掌握的非手术肿瘤学最低能力:一项德尔菲调查。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 Jul;27(7):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
6
New edition of Tomorrow's Doctors.《明日医生》新版。
Med Teach. 2002 Jul;24(4):368-9. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000000816.
7
The implementation of Tomorrow's Doctors.《明日医生》的实施
Med Educ. 2002 Mar;36(3):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01152.x.
8
Physical activity education in the undergraduate curricula of all UK medical schools: are tomorrow's doctors equipped to follow clinical guidelines?英国所有医学院本科课程中的体育活动教育:未来的医生是否具备遵循临床指南的能力?
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;46(14):1024-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091380. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Tomorrow's doctors: today's mistakes?明日之医:今日之谬误?
Clin Anat. 1999;12(2):131-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:2<131::AID-CA9>3.0.CO;2-L.
10
Training tomorrow's doctors in the preoperative clinic.在术前诊所培训未来的医生。
Clin Teach. 2013 Jun;10(3):190-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00641.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking more wisely: using the Socratic method to develop critical thinking skills amongst healthcare students.更明智地思考:在医疗保健学生中使用苏格拉底法发展批判性思维技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2.
2
The effect of social interaction on decision making in emergency ambulance teams: a statistical discourse analysis.社交互动对急救救护车团队决策的影响:一项统计话语分析
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04091-w.
3
The trend of critical thinking disposition in medical students and its relationship with their academic performance.
医学生批判性思维倾向的趋势及其与学业成绩的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:479. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_55_21. eCollection 2021.
4
Validation of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory from a Private Medical University in India.印度一所私立医科大学元认知意识量表的验证
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Sep 30;10:324. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_39_21. eCollection 2021.
5
An Analysis into Metacognition and Family History of Diabetes Mellitus among First Year Medical Students.一年级医学生的元认知与糖尿病家族史分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jul;11(7):CC05-CC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30047.10309. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Residents: admissions, training and assessment.住院医师:入院、培训与评估。
Can Med Educ J. 2015 Dec 11;6(2):e1-3. eCollection 2015.
7
Thinking about thinking: changes in first-year medical students' metacognition and its relation to performance.思考思维:一年级医学生元认知的变化及其与学业表现的关系。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Aug 26;20:27561. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27561. eCollection 2015.
8
A study to enhance medical students' professional decision-making, using teaching interventions on common medications.一项利用针对常用药物的教学干预措施来提高医学生专业决策能力的研究。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jun 5;20:27097. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27097. eCollection 2015.
9
"Personal mission statement": An analysis of medical students' and general practitioners' reflections on personal beliefs, values and goals in life.“个人使命宣言”:对医学生和全科医生关于个人信仰、价值观及人生目标的思考的分析
Malays Fam Physician. 2014 Aug 31;9(2):26-33. eCollection 2014.
10
Taking the learning beyond the individual: how reflection informs change in practice.将学习范围扩展至个人之外:反思如何推动实践变革。
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Feb 8;5:24-30. doi: 10.5116/ijme.52ec.d21f.