• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交互动对急救救护车团队决策的影响:一项统计话语分析

The effect of social interaction on decision making in emergency ambulance teams: a statistical discourse analysis.

作者信息

Tekïn Murat, Uysal İbrahim, Toraman Çetin, Akman Canan, Aytuğ Koşan Ayşen Melek, Postaci Emine Sevïnç

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.

Department of First and Emergency Aid, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04091-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04091-w
PMID:36803591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942383/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the effects of social interaction, cognitive flexibility, and seniority on the correct response among emergency ambulance teams during case intervention.

METHODS

The research, structured with the sequential exploratory mixed method, was conducted with 18 emergency ambulance personnel. The approach process of the teams working on the scenario was video recorded. The records were transcribed by the researchers, including gestures and facial expressions. Discourses were coded and modeled with regression.

RESULTS

The number of discourses was higher in groups with high correct intervention scores. As the level of cognitive flexibility or seniority increased, the correct intervention score tended to decrease too. Informing has been identified as the only variable that positively affects the correct response to the emergency case, especially in the first period, which is directed toward case intervention preparation.

CONCLUSION

Within the findings of the research, it is recommended that activities and scenario-based training practices that will increase the intra-team communication of the emergency ambulance personnel should be included in the medical education and in-service training.

摘要

引言

本研究考察了社交互动、认知灵活性和资历对急救医疗队在病例干预过程中正确反应的影响。

方法

本研究采用序贯探索性混合方法,对18名急救医疗人员进行了研究。对处理该场景的团队的操作过程进行了视频记录。研究人员对记录进行了转录,包括手势和面部表情。对话被编码并用回归模型进行分析。

结果

正确干预得分高的组中的对话数量更多。随着认知灵活性或资历水平的提高,正确干预得分也往往会降低。已确定告知是对紧急病例正确反应有积极影响的唯一变量,尤其是在针对病例干预准备的第一阶段。

结论

根据研究结果,建议在医学教育和在职培训中纳入能够增加急救医疗人员团队内部沟通的活动和基于场景的培训实践。

相似文献

1
The effect of social interaction on decision making in emergency ambulance teams: a statistical discourse analysis.社交互动对急救救护车团队决策的影响:一项统计话语分析
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04091-w.
2
The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System.大城市基于消防的急救医疗服务系统中救护车人员配备模式的影响
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):175-179. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001539. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Prehospital Resuscitation Decision Making: A model of ambulance personnel experiences, preparation and support.院前复苏决策:基于急救人员的经验、准备和支持的模型。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Aug;33(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13715. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
[Emergency medical service response to major incidents. A study of 21 cases].[紧急医疗服务对重大事件的响应。21例病例研究]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Feb;46(2):114-20. doi: 10.1007/s001010050380.
5
Team talk and team decision processes: a qualitative discourse analytical approach to 10 real-life medical emergency team encounters.团队交流与团队决策过程:一种针对10次实际医疗急救团队遭遇情况的定性话语分析方法
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 3;8(11):e023749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023749.
6
Complexity of the decision-making process of ambulance staff for assessment and referral of older people who have fallen: a qualitative study.救护车工作人员评估和转介跌倒老年人的决策过程的复杂性:一项定性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jan;28(1):44-50. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.079566. Epub 2010 May 14.
7
Exploring the experiences and challenges of motorcycle ambulance personnel in pre-hospital emergency healthcare services: A qualitative study.探索摩托车救护车工作人员在院前急救医疗服务中的经历与挑战:一项定性研究。
Work. 2025 Feb;80(2):691-700. doi: 10.3233/WOR-240113. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
8
Patients who call emergency ambulances for primary care problems: a qualitative study of the decision-making process.因初级保健问题拨打紧急救护车的患者:决策过程的定性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jun;31(6):448-52. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202124. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
9
Child and provider restraints in ambulances: knowledge, opinions, and behaviors of emergency medical services providers.救护车中儿童及医护人员的约束措施:急救医疗服务人员的知识、观点及行为
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):886-92. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.03.562. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
10
Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.针对“非紧急”999急救服务呼叫者的计算机辅助评估与建议:对救护车调度的潜在影响
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):178-83. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral courage approach-based ethics education effect on clinical decision making of emergency nurses.基于道德勇气方法的伦理教育对急诊护士临床决策的影响
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:212. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_2054_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Looking at Social Interactions in Medical Education with Dual Eye-Tracking Technology: A Scoping Review.运用双眼追踪技术审视医学教育中的社会互动:一项范围综述
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Dec 18;14:215. doi: 10.12688/mep.20577.2. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Group Versus Individual Problem Solving Revealed by fMRI.功能磁共振成像揭示的团队与个体解决问题的神经关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 28;14:290. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00290. eCollection 2020.
2
Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging.人类社会互动的脑基础:从概念到脑成像
Physiol Rev. 2009 Apr;89(2):453-79. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2007.
3
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature.医疗保健动态领域中的团队合作与患者安全:文献综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x.
4
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery.外科手术团队观察性评估(OTAS):在泌尿外科手术中的完善与应用
World J Surg. 2007 Jul;31(7):1373-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9053-z.
5
Operating room briefings and wrong-site surgery.手术室术前简报与手术部位错误
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Feb;204(2):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.10.018. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
6
Evaluating the management of septic shock using patient simulation.使用患者模拟评估感染性休克的管理。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):769-75. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000256849.75799.20.
7
Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre.对手术室团队合作与安全的态度。
Surgeon. 2006 Jun;4(3):145-51. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(06)80084-3.
8
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size.在字母转数字问题上,团队比最优秀的个人表现更出色:团队规模的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):644-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644.
9
A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre.在模拟手术室进行手术模拟时,对外科实习医生的技术和团队技能进行人为因素分析。
Ann Surg. 2005 Nov;242(5):631-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000186298.79308.a8.
10
Perceptions of operating room tension across professions: building generalizable evidence and educational resources.不同职业对手术室紧张氛围的认知:构建可推广的证据和教育资源。
Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S75-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00021.