Weisz J R, McCarty C A
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1563, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):598-605. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.4.598.
Research comparing cultural and ethnic groups on child psychopathology has relied heavily on parent reports. But don't parents' own cultural backgrounds bias their reports, undermining valid assessment of actual child behavior? The question is hard to address because parent and child culture tend to be confounded. To solve this problem, we assembled an unusual but heuristically valuable sample: 50 bicultural families, each with an ethnic Thai parent reared in Thailand and a Caucasian parent reared in the U.S. Parents in each pair independently completed standardized problem checklists on the same child in their family. Across all 10 empirically derived problem syndromes, no parental culture effect was either significant or larger than "small," by Cohen's (1988) standards; across all 140 specific problems, the mean percent of variance accounted for by parent culture was less than 1%. Results do not point to a biasing effect of parental culture.
比较不同文化和种族群体儿童精神病理学的研究严重依赖于家长报告。但是,家长自身的文化背景难道不会使他们的报告产生偏差,从而破坏对儿童实际行为的有效评估吗?这个问题很难解决,因为家长和孩子的文化往往相互混淆。为了解决这个问题,我们收集了一个不同寻常但具有启发价值的样本:50个双文化家庭,每个家庭都有一位在泰国长大的泰国裔家长和一位在美国长大的白人家长。每对家长独立完成关于他们家中同一个孩子的标准化问题清单。根据科恩(1988年)的标准,在所有10种基于实证得出的问题综合征中,家长文化效应既不显著,也没有大于“小”的效应;在所有140个具体问题中,家长文化所解释的方差平均百分比不到1%。研究结果并未表明家长文化存在偏差效应。