Cox J, Cotzias C S, Siakpere O, Osuagwu F I, Holmes E P, Paterson-Brown S
Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Dec;106(12):1280-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08182.x.
To assess whether an inflatable obstetric belt, synchronised to apply uniform fundal pressure during a uterine contraction, reduces operative delivery rates when used in the second stage of labour.
Randomised controlled trial.
Five hundred nulliparae with a singleton cephalic pregnancy at term and with an epidural in labour were recruited during the first stage and randomised at full dilatation. Standard care involved one hour passive second stage and one hour active pushing after which instrumental delivery was performed if delivery was not imminent. Those randomised to the belt group, in addition to standard care, had the inflatable obstetric belt for the whole second stage of labour.
Mode of delivery.
One hundred and eleven of the 260 women in the belt group (42.7%) compared with 94 of the 240 in the control group (39.2%) had a spontaneous vertex delivery (P = 0.423). The lift-out instrumental delivery rate was similar between the two groups: 108 belts (41.5%), compared with 101 controls (42.1%) (P = 0.902), whereas rotational instrumental deliveries in the belt group were 26 belts (10%) compared with 36 controls (15%) (P = 0.09). Fifteen women (5.8%) in the belt group and nine women (3.8%) in the control group had a caesarean section in the second stage (P = 0.292). An intact perineum was more likely in the belt group (16.5% compared with 9.6%, P = 0.022) as was a third degree tear (6.5% compared with 0.4%, P = 0.001).
The inflatable obstetric belt did not significantly reduce operative delivery rates when used in this clinical setting in the second stage of labour.
评估一种在子宫收缩期间同步施加均匀宫底压力的充气式产科束带在第二产程使用时是否能降低手术分娩率。
随机对照试验。
招募了500名单胎头位足月妊娠且分娩时使用硬膜外麻醉的初产妇,在第一产程期间进行招募并在宫口开全时随机分组。标准护理包括1小时的被动第二产程和1小时的主动用力,若分娩未即刻发生则进行器械助产。随机分组到束带组的产妇,除接受标准护理外,在整个第二产程使用充气式产科束带。
分娩方式。
束带组260名女性中有111名(42.7%)自然头位分娩,而对照组240名中有94名(39.2%)自然头位分娩(P = 0.423)。两组间娩出式器械助产率相似:束带组108例(41.5%),对照组101例(42.1%)(P = 0.902),而束带组旋转式器械助产为26例(10%),对照组为36例(15%)(P = 0.09)。束带组15名女性(5.8%)和对照组9名女性(3.8%)在第二产程进行了剖宫产(P = 0.292)。束带组更有可能会阴完整(16.5% 对比9.6%,P = 0.022),三度撕裂也是如此(6.5% 对比0.4%,P = 0.001)。
在第二产程的这种临床环境中使用充气式产科束带并不能显著降低手术分娩率。