Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L
Department of Oncology at Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Jan;105(1):66-74; discussion 75-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00011.
During the last 30 years, many methods for delayed breast reconstruction have been described. There is a lack of prospective randomized trials comparing reconstruction methods. The present study (SVEA), conducted 1995 to 1996, describes the impacts of three methods: the lateral thoracodorsal flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, and the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), on important areas of life, patients' perception of cosmetic result, and quality of life. Questionnaires were completed before randomization and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The preoperative questionnaire concerned the impact of breast loss and expectations on reconstruction. Follow-up questionnaires dealt with satisfaction with cosmetic result and impact on important areas of life. A health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36) was completed at all points of assessment. A total of 75 of 87 randomized patients underwent breast reconstruction: 16 patients with the lateral thoracodorsal flap, 30 with the latissimus dorsi flap, and 29 with the TRAM flap. The majority were very satisfied with the cosmetic result. Most women reported improvements in important areas of life, and quality of life in terms of "social functioning" and "mental health" increased significantly after the reconstruction. The latissimus dorsi flap and TRAM flap scored significantly higher as compared with the lateral thoracodorsal flap for similarity with the contralateral breast and reduced problems in social situations. No differences between irradiated and nonirradiated patients were found. All methods were considered to produce good cosmetic results and improvements in patient-defined problem areas of life and quality of life. No negative effects were recorded. Thus, irrespective of method, breast reconstruction is a valuable tool for the mastectomized woman to cope with problems in everyday life.
在过去30年里,已经描述了许多延迟乳房重建的方法。目前缺乏比较重建方法的前瞻性随机试验。1995年至1996年进行的本研究(SVEA)描述了三种方法:胸背外侧皮瓣、背阔肌皮瓣和带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)对生活重要领域、患者对美容效果的感知以及生活质量的影响。在随机分组前以及术后6个月和12个月完成问卷调查。术前问卷涉及乳房缺失的影响和对重建的期望。随访问卷涉及对美容效果的满意度以及对生活重要领域的影响。在所有评估点都完成了一份与健康相关的生活质量问卷(SF - 36)。87名随机分组的患者中有75名接受了乳房重建:16名患者采用胸背外侧皮瓣,30名采用背阔肌皮瓣,29名采用TRAM皮瓣。大多数患者对美容效果非常满意。大多数女性报告在生活的重要领域有所改善,并且重建后“社会功能”和“心理健康”方面的生活质量显著提高。与胸背外侧皮瓣相比,背阔肌皮瓣和TRAM皮瓣在与对侧乳房的相似度以及社交场合中问题减少方面得分显著更高。未发现接受放疗和未接受放疗的患者之间存在差异。所有方法都被认为能产生良好的美容效果,并改善患者定义的生活问题领域和生活质量。未记录到负面影响。因此,无论采用何种方法,乳房重建对于接受乳房切除术的女性应对日常生活中的问题都是一种有价值的手段。