Losken Albert, Nicholas Claire S, Pinell Ximena A, Carlson Grant W
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Jul;65(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181bda349.
The demand for bilateral breast reconstruction has recently increased. Although numerous options exist, the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap remains a popular technique. The benefits of additional autologous coverage are evident; however, donor site morbidity does exist. The purpose of this report is to evaluate our experience with bilateral latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions, focusing on donor site morbidity and patient satisfaction. All patients who underwent bilateral latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospital, were evaluated and included in the series. Data points queried included patient demographics, risk factors, radiation therapy, timing of the procedure (immediate or delayed), type of procedure (latissimus dorsi only, latissimus dorsi with expander, latissimus dorsi with implant), and outcomes. Outcomes included >1 additional operation, any breast and any donor-site complications. A patient satisfaction survey was performed evaluating outcomes such as aesthetic results, general satisfaction, morbidities, and functional assessment. Comparisons were made using radiation therapy, timing of reconstruction, and type of reconstruction as variables. Eighty-three patients underwent bilateral latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction with an average follow-up of 2.3 years. The method of reconstruction included latissimus dorsi with expander (n = 54), latissimus dorsi only (n = 17), and latissimus dorsi with implant (n = 12). Breast complications occurred in 34% of the patients with radiation therapy being a significant risk factor. The average number of secondary operations was 2.3 with the expander group resulting in an increased need for additional procedures. Overall patient satisfaction was 3.93/5, with the average symmetry score being 3.82/5, shape 3.84/5, nipple position 3.92/5, and inframammary fold (IMF) position 4/5. The majority of patients (n = 28/37) reported no pain (0/5) at the time of the survey. Most patients (n = 33/37) reported no impairment in daily activities, however, some did report impairment in physical activity, decreased range of motion (ROM), and pain. The latissimus dorsi remains a reliable option for bilateral breast reconstruction. Although patient satisfaction with this approach remains high, functional impairment can occur and needs to be appropriately discussed.
近年来,双侧乳房重建的需求有所增加。尽管存在多种选择,但背阔肌肌皮瓣仍然是一种常用的技术。额外自体覆盖的益处显而易见;然而,供区并发症确实存在。本报告的目的是评估我们进行双侧背阔肌乳房重建的经验,重点关注供区并发症和患者满意度。所有在埃默里大学医院接受双侧背阔肌乳房重建的患者均接受评估并纳入本系列研究。查询的数据点包括患者人口统计学信息、风险因素、放射治疗、手术时机(即刻或延迟)、手术类型(仅背阔肌、带扩张器的背阔肌、带植入物的背阔肌)以及结果。结果包括超过1次的额外手术、任何乳房和供区并发症。进行了一项患者满意度调查,评估美学效果、总体满意度、并发症和功能评估等结果。以放射治疗、重建时机和重建类型作为变量进行比较。83例患者接受了双侧背阔肌乳房重建,平均随访2.3年。重建方法包括带扩张器的背阔肌(n = 54)、仅背阔肌(n = 17)和带植入物的背阔肌(n = 12)。34%接受放射治疗的患者出现了乳房并发症,放射治疗是一个重要的风险因素。二次手术的平均次数为2.3次,扩张器组需要更多额外手术。患者总体满意度为3.93/5,平均对称评分为3.82/5,外形评分为3.84/5,乳头位置评分为3.92/5,乳房下皱襞(IMF)位置评分为4/5。大多数患者(n = 28/37)在调查时报告无疼痛(0/5)。大多数患者(n = 33/37)报告日常活动无受限,然而,一些患者确实报告了身体活动受限、活动范围(ROM)减小和疼痛。背阔肌仍然是双侧乳房重建的可靠选择。尽管患者对这种方法的满意度仍然很高,但可能会出现功能障碍,需要进行适当的讨论。