Suppr超能文献

Jones矫治器磨牙远中移动与口外牵引的比较。

Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.

作者信息

Haydar S, Uner O

机构信息

Ba"skent University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jan;117(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70247-2.

Abstract

In this study, 20 patients were evaluated. Ten were treated with intraoral distalization followed by fixed appliance therapy, and 10 were treated with extra oral traction followed by fixed appliance therapy. Molar relationship correction was achieved in 2.5 months with intraoral distalization and in 10.7 months with extraoral distalization. A significant anterior movement of the anchorage unit (P <.001) was observed with the intraoral distalization and a significant distal drift of premolars was observed in the headgear group (P <.05). Palatal plane was found to tip downward significantly in the headgear group (P <.05). Total outcome of the 2 methods were discussed evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 distalization methods.

摘要

在本研究中,对20例患者进行了评估。10例采用口内远中移动加固定矫治器治疗,10例采用口外牵引加固定矫治器治疗。口内远中移动在2.5个月时实现磨牙关系矫正,口外远中移动则在10.7个月时实现。口内远中移动时观察到支抗单位显著向前移动(P<.001),头帽组中前磨牙出现显著远中漂移(P<.05)。头帽组中腭平面显著向下倾斜(P<.05)。讨论了两种方法的总体结果,评估了两种远中移动方法的优缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验