Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):459-65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp136. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoalveolar effects of a pendulum appliance supported buccally by a K-loop, and to compare these with a cervical headgear (CHG) group. The records of 30 patients with skeletal Class I and dental Class II malocclusions were divided in to two groups: Patients in group 1 (seven females and eight males; mean age, 15.0 +/- 3.4 years) were treated with a pendulum appliance supported with a K-loop buccally, while in group 2 (10 females and 5 males; mean age, 14.2 +/- 2.9 years), the patients were treated with CHG. Standardized lateral cephalograms and study models were taken at the beginning of treatment (T0) and at the end of distal molar movement (T1). T0-T1 changes within the groups were analysed with a paired t-test, and between the groups with a t-test. The mean amount of distalization was 4.53 +/- 1.46 mm in group 1 and 2.23 +/- 1.68 mm in group 2. The mean amount of distal tipping for group 1 was 5.13 +/- 4.90 degrees; the mean amount of mesial tipping for group 2 was 0.80 +/- 2.27 degrees. Intrusion and mesiobuccal rotation of the maxillary molars were achieved in both groups. In group 1, the amount of labial protrusion and tipping of the maxillary incisors was not statistically significant. In group 2, palatoversion and retrusion of the maxillary incisors was statistically significant (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). The two major disadvantages of intraoral appliances, which are distal tipping of molars and loss of anchorage at the anterior teeth, were significantly decreased with the use of a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
本研究旨在评估颊面管支抗的钟摆式矫治器与颈带(CHG)对牙颌的影响,并对其进行比较。将 30 例骨骼 I 类、牙齿 II 类错颌患者的记录分为两组:组 1(7 名女性和 8 名男性;平均年龄 15.0 +/- 3.4 岁)使用颊面管支抗的钟摆式矫治器治疗,而组 2(10 名女性和 5 名男性;平均年龄 14.2 +/- 2.9 岁)则使用 CHG 治疗。在治疗开始时(T0)和远移磨牙结束时(T1),拍摄标准侧位头颅侧位片和研究模型。采用配对 t 检验分析组内 T0-T1 变化,采用 t 检验分析组间差异。组 1 的远移量平均为 4.53 +/- 1.46mm,组 2 的远移量平均为 2.23 +/- 1.68mm。组 1 的远中倾斜量平均为 5.13 +/- 4.90 度;组 2 的近中倾斜量平均为 0.80 +/- 2.27 度。上颌磨牙均实现了内收和颊向倾斜。组 1 上颌切牙的唇向突出和倾斜量无统计学意义。组 2 上颌切牙的腭向旋转和后缩有统计学意义(分别为 P < 0.01 和 P < 0.001)。颊面管支抗钟摆式矫治器组合的使用显著降低了牙颌内矫治器的两个主要缺点,即磨牙远中倾斜和前牙支抗丧失。
Eur J Orthod. 2010-3-15
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010-5
Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2014
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008-11
J Orthod Sci. 2017
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2016
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-10-23