Suppr超能文献

四种人体工程学干预评估工具:电力公司仓库系统的案例研究

Four assessment tools of ergonomics interventions: case study at an electric utility's warehouse system.

作者信息

Marklin R W, Wilzbacher J R

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999 Nov-Dec;60(6):777-84. doi: 10.1080/00028899908984501.

Abstract

An ergonomics program was developed in a Midwestern electric utility warehouse system. Tasks problematic with respect to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) affecting both the back and upper extremities were identified and engineering controls were implemented. Quantitative analysis was performed on each task before and after ergonomics intervention to evaluate exposure to the risk of WMSDs. Four methods were used to evaluate the risk of exposure to injury before and after ergonomics intervention: the 1991 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation, the Static Strength Prediction Program, the Lumbar Motion Monitor, and the Borg psychophysical assessment of effort. Results from applying these four methods to the reengineered tasks showed that the probability of low-back disorder risk factors was reduced by as much as 29%, the percentage of people capable of performing tasks was increased by as much as 90%, the NIOSH Lifting Index was reduced from above 2.0 to less than 2.0, and the psychophysical assessment of effort was consistently reduced from the "heavy or strong" range to the "light or moderate" range.

摘要

在中西部一家电力公司的仓库系统中开展了一项人体工程学计划。识别出了对影响背部和上肢的与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)存在问题的任务,并实施了工程控制措施。在人体工程学干预前后,对每项任务进行了定量分析,以评估WMSDs风险暴露情况。采用四种方法评估人体工程学干预前后的受伤风险暴露情况:1991年美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的提举方程、静态力量预测程序、腰部活动监测仪以及博格主观用力评估法。将这四种方法应用于重新设计的任务后得出的结果表明,下背部疾病风险因素的概率降低了多达29%,能够完成任务的人员比例提高了多达90%,NIOSH提举指数从2.0以上降至2.0以下,主观用力评估法一直从“重或强”范围降至“轻或适中”范围。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验