Seeley Patricia A, Marklin Richard W
We Energies, 2425 S 35th Street, Mail Code SSC2, Milwaukee, WI 53215, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2003 Sep;34(5):429-39. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00063-2.
Ergonomics analysis of line workers in the electric power industry who work overhead on utility poles revealed some tasks for which less than 1% of the general population had sufficient strength to perform. During a 2-year study, a large Midwestern US electric utility provided a university with a team of represented workers and management. They evaluated, recommended, and monitored interventions for 32 common line worker tasks that were rated at medium to high magnitude of risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Two of the recommended ergonomic interventions-the battery-operated press and cutter-were selected by the team as having the greatest potential for reducing risk factors of MSDs. Only overhead distribution line worker tasks were evaluated. A business case was formulated that took into account medical injury and illness statistics, workers' compensation, replacement worker and retraining costs. An outline of a business case formulation and a sample intervention payback calculation is shown. Based on the business case, the utility committed over US dollars 300000 to purchase battery-operated presses and cutters for their overhead distribution line crews.
对电力行业中在电线杆上进行高空作业的线路工人进行的人体工程学分析表明,某些任务只有不到1%的普通人群具备足够的力量来完成。在一项为期两年的研究中,美国中西部一家大型电力公司为一所大学提供了一组有代表性的工人和管理人员。他们对32项常见的线路工人任务进行了评估、推荐并监测干预措施,这些任务被评定为肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)风险因素的中高等级。团队选择了两项推荐的人体工程学干预措施——电池驱动的压力机和切割机,认为它们在降低MSD风险因素方面具有最大潜力。仅对架空配电线路工人的任务进行了评估。制定了一个商业案例,其中考虑了工伤和疾病统计数据、工人赔偿、替代工人和再培训成本。展示了一个商业案例制定大纲和一个示例干预回报计算。基于该商业案例,该电力公司投入超过30万美元为其架空配电线路工作人员购买电池驱动的压力机和切割机。