• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎硬度扫描仪与卡规带测量:额外成本是否合理?

Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements: is the extra cost justifiable?

作者信息

Chen J, Greenstein A, Sofer M, Matzkin H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, Tel Aviv 64329, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):315-8; discussion 318. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900438.

DOI:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900438
PMID:10637460
Abstract

Both RigiScan and the Snap Gauge band devices are used to objectively measure penile rigidity. The Snap Gauge band is the more simple and inexpensive of the two techniques. We investigated the correlation between the results obtained by both devices in order to evaluate whether the Snap Gauge band could be employed as the sole method of rigidity evaluation while not affecting the quality of diagnosis. Forty eight patients who were presented to our erectile dysfunction clinic used the two devices simultaneously, each according to the accepted protocols. Breakage of two and three strings of the Snap Gauge (good rigidity) correlated well with good tip and average rigidity as evaluated by the RigiScan. Snap gauge results also correlated with duration of erection, number of erections, the number of adequate erections, and the longest duration of erection measured by the RigiScan. Therefore, good rigidity according to the Snap Gauge test correlated well with the results of functional erections (number, rigidity, duration) as obtained by the RigiScan. The Snap Gauge band can be used to adequately evaluate penile rigidity. RigiScan measurements, which are more complicated and more expensive, should be reserved for selected patients in whom the results of the Snap Gauge band are inconclusive or when more detailed information is required.

摘要

RigiScan和Snap Gauge带式设备都用于客观测量阴茎硬度。Snap Gauge带是这两种技术中更简单且更便宜的。我们研究了这两种设备所获结果之间的相关性,以评估Snap Gauge带是否可以用作唯一的硬度评估方法而不影响诊断质量。四十八名到我们勃起功能障碍诊所就诊的患者同时使用这两种设备,每种设备均按照公认的方案使用。Snap Gauge的两根和三根线断裂(良好硬度)与RigiScan评估的良好阴茎头硬度和平均硬度密切相关。Snap Gauge的结果也与勃起持续时间、勃起次数、充分勃起次数以及RigiScan测量的最长勃起持续时间相关。因此,根据Snap Gauge测试得出的良好硬度与RigiScan所获功能性勃起结果(次数、硬度、持续时间)密切相关。Snap Gauge带可用于充分评估阴茎硬度。RigiScan测量更复杂且更昂贵,应保留给Snap Gauge带结果不确定或需要更详细信息的特定患者。

相似文献

1
Rigiscan versus snap gauge band measurements: is the extra cost justifiable?阴茎硬度扫描仪与卡规带测量:额外成本是否合理?
Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):315-8; discussion 318. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900438.
2
Snap-Gauge band compared to RigiScan Plus in a nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of erectile dysfunction.
Urol Int. 2003;71(1):96-9. doi: 10.1159/000071103.
3
Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients.阴茎轴向弯曲力与Rigiscan径向硬度随海绵体内压的变化关系:为何Rigiscan不能预测个体患者的功能性勃起。
Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):327-37; discusion 337-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900443.
4
Snap-Gauge band versus penile rigidity in impotence assessment.用于阳痿评估的卡规带与阴茎硬度
J Urol. 1988 Jul;140(1):61-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41486-8.
5
Utility of Rigiscan and papaverine in diagnosis of erectile impotence.阴茎硬度测试仪和罂粟碱在勃起功能障碍诊断中的应用
Urology. 1988 Jun;31(6):526-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90225-7.
6
Reply to Editorial Comments on 'Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients'.对关于“阴茎海绵体内压力作用下的阴茎轴向弯曲力与Rigiscan径向硬度:为何Rigiscan无法预测个体患者的功能性勃起”的社论评论的回复
Int J Impot Res. 2000 Feb;12(1):3-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900535.
7
The performance of the Rigiscan in the measurement of penile tumescence and rigidity.Rigiscan在阴茎勃起度和硬度测量中的表现。
Int J Impot Res. 1993 Jun;5(2):69-76.
8
Snap-gauge compared to a full nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of patients with erectile impotence.与全夜阴茎勃起功能研究相比,卡规用于评估勃起功能障碍患者。
J Urol. 1990 Jan;143(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39862-2.
9
Clinical applicability of a new tactile sensor for evaluating rigidity of the penis: a comparative study with Rigiscan.一种用于评估阴茎硬度的新型触觉传感器的临床适用性:与Rigiscan的对比研究
Int J Urol. 1996 Sep;3(5):379-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1996.tb00557.x.
10
Nocturnal penile rigidity measured by the snap-gauge band.用卡环测量夜间阴茎硬度。
J Urol. 1983 May;129(5):964-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52486-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Research on Correlation between Erectile Function Assessment through International Index of Erectile Function Score and Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity Measurements in Men with Erectile Dysfunction.国际勃起功能指数评分评估勃起功能与勃起功能障碍男性夜间阴茎勃起及硬度测量之间相关性的初步研究
F1000Res. 2025 Jul 30;14:142. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.149499.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Penile sympathetic skin response in patients with non-organic erectile dysfunction: a Cross-Sectional Study.非器质性勃起功能障碍患者的阴茎交感神经皮肤反应:一项横断面研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01096-5.
3
A wearable adaptive penile rigidity monitoring system for assessment of erectile dysfunction.
一种用于评估勃起功能障碍的可穿戴自适应阴茎硬度监测系统。
Microsyst Nanoeng. 2024 Sep 20;10(1):131. doi: 10.1038/s41378-024-00721-5.
4
Relation between intracavernosal dose of prostaglandin Pge 1 and mean duration of erection in men with different underlying causes of erectile dysfunction.患有不同潜在病因勃起功能障碍男性的阴茎海绵体内前列腺素Pge 1剂量与平均勃起持续时间的关系。
Croat Med J. 2007 Feb;48(1):76-80.