• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学互动过程系统(MIPS):一种用于分析肿瘤学家与癌症患者访谈的工具。

The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer.

作者信息

Ford S, Hall A, Ratcliffe D, Fallowfield L

机构信息

Department of Oncology, University College London Medical School, Bland Sutton Institute, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2000 Feb;50(4):553-66. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00308-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00308-1
PMID:10641807
Abstract

The increase in communication skills training for doctors has led to the need for more effective means of evaluation. Analysis of video and audiotaped consultations using systems of interaction analysis can provide the trainee with in-depth feedback about their communication skills. Most interaction process systems were designed for use in primary care and recent research has questioned the applicability of these systems in medical specialties such as oncology. We describe the development of a new instrument, the Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS) for use in teaching communication skills and empirical research in medical encounters, particularly, between doctors and patients with cancer. A comparison of the MIPS and comparable behaviour categories of another widely used system (the Roter Interaction Analysis System) was made to test convergent validity. Pearson correlation coefficients suggested a good level of concurrence between the two systems. Intercoder reliability tests were carried out between two coders at two separate time periods. Both of these indicated good reliability for the majority of categories. The two major advantages of the MIPS over other coding systems are: (1) the system allows for sequential and parallel coding, thus avoiding major coding conflicts and (2) the design of the coding sheet results in a multidimensional view of the consultation without data loss. We believe that the MIPS yields useful information for teaching doctors communication skills and also provides an objective method for evaluating the effectiveness of communication skills courses.

摘要

医生沟通技能培训的增加导致了对更有效评估方法的需求。使用互动分析系统对视频和录音会诊进行分析,可以为受训者提供有关其沟通技能的深入反馈。大多数互动过程系统是为初级保健设计的,最近的研究对这些系统在肿瘤学等医学专科中的适用性提出了质疑。我们描述了一种新工具——医学互动过程系统(MIPS)的开发,该系统用于教授沟通技能以及在医疗会诊中,特别是在医生与癌症患者之间的实证研究。对MIPS与另一个广泛使用的系统(罗特互动分析系统)的可比行为类别进行了比较,以测试收敛效度。皮尔逊相关系数表明这两个系统之间有良好的一致性。在两个不同时间段由两名编码员进行了编码员间信度测试。这两项测试均表明大多数类别具有良好的信度。MIPS相对于其他编码系统的两个主要优点是:(1)该系统允许顺序编码和平行编码,从而避免了主要的编码冲突;(2)编码表的设计可以在不损失数据的情况下提供会诊的多维视图。我们认为,MIPS为教授医生沟通技能提供了有用的信息,也为评估沟通技能课程的有效性提供了一种客观方法。

相似文献

1
The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer.医学互动过程系统(MIPS):一种用于分析肿瘤学家与癌症患者访谈的工具。
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Feb;50(4):553-66. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00308-1.
2
Communication behaviours of skilled and less skilled oncologists: a validation study of the Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS).经验丰富和经验较少的肿瘤学家的沟通行为:医学互动过程系统(MIPS)的验证研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Sep;54(3):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.004.
3
Communication analysis in oncology care. Performance of a combination of a content analysis system and a global scale.肿瘤学护理中的沟通分析。内容分析系统和全球量表的组合表现。
Psychooncology. 2011 Sep;20(9):992-1000. doi: 10.1002/pon.1808. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
4
Assessing Communication Skills in Real Medical Encounters in Oncology: Development and Validation of the ComOn-Coaching Rating Scales.评估肿瘤学实际医疗问诊中的沟通技巧:ComOn-Coaching评分量表的开发与验证
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Feb;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1269-5.
5
Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training.寻求癌症临床试验的知情同意;评估医生沟通技能培训的效果。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):507-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1095.
6
Development and evaluation of a checklist assessing communication skills of oncologists: the COM-ON-Checklist.评估肿瘤学家沟通技巧的检查表的制定与评估:COM-ON-Checklist。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01556.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
7
Exploring the communication of oncologists, patients and family members in cancer consultations: development and application of a coding system capturing family-relevant behaviours (KINcode).探索肿瘤学家、患者及其家庭成员在癌症会诊中的沟通:一种捕捉与家庭相关行为的编码系统(KINcode)的开发与应用
Psychooncology. 2016 Jul;25(7):787-94. doi: 10.1002/pon.4003. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
MEDICODE: an instrument to describe and evaluate exchanges on medications that occur during medical encounters.MEDICODE:一种用于描述和评估医疗过程中药物使用情况交流的工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
9
The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties.肿瘤会诊中的罗特互动分析系统(RIAS):心理测量特性。
Psychooncology. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):387-401. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(1998090)7:5<387::AID-PON316>3.0.CO;2-G.
10
Behind closed doors: systematic analysis of breast cancer consultation communication and predictors of satisfaction with communication.闭门造车:系统分析乳腺癌咨询沟通及沟通满意度的预测因素。
Psychooncology. 2010 Jun;19(6):626-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.1592.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic and pragmatic precision in conversational AI systems.对话式人工智能系统中的语义和语用精确性。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 30;6:896729. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.896729. eCollection 2023.
2
Quantitative interpretation of utterances and movements from videoed interactions between rheumatology nurses and patients commencing methotrexate: a pilot study.从开始使用甲氨蝶呤的风湿病护士和患者的视频交互中对言语和动作进行定量解释:一项试点研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Dec;41(12):3869-3877. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06336-3. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
The Influence of Online Health Information Seeking Before a Consultation on Anxiety, Satisfaction, and Information Recall, Mediated by Patient Participation: Field Study.
在线健康信息搜索对咨询前焦虑、满意度和信息记忆的影响,通过患者参与中介:现场研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 5;23(7):e23670. doi: 10.2196/23670.
4
Caring Behavior Coding Scheme based on Swanson's Theory of Caring - development and testing among undergraduate nursing students.基于斯旺森关怀理论的关怀行为编码方案——本科护生的发展与测试。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Dec;35(4):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/scs.12927. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
Outcomes and outcome measures used in evaluation of communication training in oncology - a systematic literature review, an expert workshop, and recommendations for future research.评估肿瘤学中沟通培训的结果和结果衡量指标——系统文献回顾、专家研讨会以及对未来研究的建议。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6022-5.
6
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
7
Nurse practitioner consultations in primary health care: an observational interaction analysis of social interactions and consultation outcomes.初级卫生保健中的执业护士会诊:社会互动与会诊结果的观察性互动分析
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Jul 6;20:e37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000427.
8
Factors associated with patient recall of key information in ambulatory specialty care visits: Results of an innovative methodology.门诊专科护理就诊中与患者对关键信息的回忆相关的因素:一种创新方法的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191940. eCollection 2018.
9
How to assess communication skills? Development of the rating scale ComOn Check.如何评估沟通技巧?ComOn Check 评分量表的制定。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1392823. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1392823.
10
Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.实现目标一致的医疗照护:一个严重疾病沟通及其影响的概念模型和测量方法。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S17-S27. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0459. Epub 2017 Nov 1.