Rehak D C, Kasper P, Baratz M E, Hagberg W C, McClain E, Imbriglia J E
Hughston Clinic, PC, Columbus, GA, USA.
Orthopedics. 2000 Jan;23(1):43-8. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000101-15.
This retrospective study compared plate fixation versus pin fixation in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent wrist arthrodesis. Fixation was achieved by using plates in 32 patients and longitudinal pins in 25 patients. Clinical follow-up averaged 29 months (range: 12-57 months) and radiographic follow-up averaged 16 months (range 12-39 months). Union occurred in 97% of the wrists fixed with plates and in 96% of the wrists fixed with pins. There were 6 (19%) complications in the plate group and 7 (28%) complications in the pin group. Three (12%) wrists fixed with pins moved from the immediate postoperative position to a position of relative volar flexion, while radiographs showed no changes in wrist position in the plate group. With both methods, successful arthrodesis stabilized the wrist in a high percentage of patients. Plate fixation offers an excellent alternative method for arthrodesis of the rheumatoid wrist.
这项回顾性研究比较了57例接受腕关节融合术的类风湿性关节炎患者采用钢板固定与钢针固定的效果。32例患者采用钢板固定,25例患者采用纵向钢针固定。临床随访平均29个月(范围:12 - 57个月),影像学随访平均16个月(范围12 - 39个月)。钢板固定的腕关节97%实现了骨愈合,钢针固定的腕关节96%实现了骨愈合。钢板组有6例(19%)出现并发症,钢针组有7例(28%)出现并发症。3例(12%)采用钢针固定的腕关节从术后即刻位置转变为相对掌屈位置,而钢板组的腕关节位置在影像学上无变化。两种方法均能使高比例患者的腕关节成功融合并实现稳定。钢板固定为类风湿性腕关节融合术提供了一种极佳的替代方法。