Cass A R, Volk R J, Nease D E
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, USA.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999;29(3):293-309. doi: 10.2190/CPYJ-2HBF-RGCN-64V2.
Primary care providers have been criticized for underrecognizing and undertreating mental health disorders. This criticism assumes patients with recognized disorders and those with unrecognized disorders suffer the same burden of illness. This study describes differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with recognized and unrecognized mood and anxiety disorders in a primary care setting.
A probability sample of 500 adult ambulatory patients from a university-based, family practice clinic, completed the PRIME-MD mood and anxiety disorder modules and the SF-36 Health Survey. Computerized patient records were reviewed retrospectively to determine recognition of mood and anxiety disorders. The Mental Health (MCS) and Physical Health (PCS) Component Summary scales of the SF-36 served as the primary outcome measures.
Sub-threshold mood and anxiety disorders were less likely to be recognized by physicians than disorders meeting DSM-III-R criteria. Recognized mood disorders were associated with a significant decrement in MCS scores (poorer HRQOL) compared with unrecognized disorders. In contrast, recognized mood disorders demonstrated slightly higher PCS scores. Recognized and unrecognized mood disorders differed significant ly in physical functioning, vitality, social functioning, role functioning related to emotional state, and mental health. Recognition of anxiety disorders was not related to HRQOL.
Patients with mental health disorders that have been recognized by their health providers appear to suffer from poorer HRQOL than patients whose disorders have not been recognized. This relationship, though, is only apparent for mood disorders. Poorer physical functioning may mask less severe emotional symptoms in mood disorders; profound emotional symptoms make recognition easier.
基层医疗服务提供者因对心理健康障碍认识不足和治疗不充分而受到批评。这种批评假定已确诊的患者和未确诊的患者承受相同的疾病负担。本研究描述了基层医疗环境中已确诊和未确诊的情绪及焦虑障碍患者在健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)方面的差异。
从一家大学附属的家庭医疗诊所选取500名成年门诊患者作为概率样本,完成PRIME-MD情绪和焦虑障碍模块以及SF-36健康调查。回顾性查阅计算机化的患者记录以确定情绪和焦虑障碍的诊断情况。SF-36的心理健康(MCS)和身体健康(PCS)分量表作为主要结局指标。
与符合DSM-III-R标准的障碍相比,亚阈值情绪和焦虑障碍被医生识别的可能性较小。与未确诊的障碍相比,已确诊的情绪障碍与MCS评分显著降低(HRQOL较差)相关。相比之下,已确诊的情绪障碍的PCS评分略高。已确诊和未确诊的情绪障碍在身体功能、活力、社会功能、与情绪状态相关的角色功能和心理健康方面存在显著差异。焦虑障碍的诊断与HRQOL无关。
与未被医疗服务提供者确诊的患者相比,已被确诊患有心理健康障碍的患者的HRQOL似乎较差。不过,这种关系仅在情绪障碍中明显。身体功能较差可能掩盖了情绪障碍中不太严重的情绪症状;严重的情绪症状更容易被识别。