• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术:重新评估

Angioplasty versus coronary artery by-pass surgery: a reappraisal.

作者信息

Chakraborty R

机构信息

Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad.

出版信息

J Indian Med Assoc. 1999 Jul;97(7):271-5.

PMID:10643190
Abstract

Revascularisation is the main principle of treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. This technique is available either by catheter intervention like angioplasty or by-pass surgery. The superiority of one over the other is still undetermined. In symptomatic single vessel disease angioplasty may be a better option than by-pass surgery. In two-vessel coronary artery disease angioplasty may also be preferred especially with good left ventricular function. In patients with double-vessel disease particularly involving proximal left anterior descending artery in association with diabetes mellitus surgery has better long term results. In multivessel disease by-pass surgery is a preferred option although initial results of angioplasty in this group may be very satisfactory. The incidence of further intervention either by surgery or repeat angioplasty is high in patients undergoing angioplasty in multivessel disease. Left main stem disease should be dealt with by-pass surgery. With continued advancement in the revascularisation technology of coronary artery disease both in catheter intervention and surgical fronts there is no room for unequivocal or universal strategy plan in the management of coronary artery disease. Both the techniques are complimentary to each other. Cost consideration is a major consideration in India. Choice should be made after proper evaluation of coronary anatomy, underlying clinical condition, local experience, social and especially economic circumstances.

摘要

血管重建是治疗阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的主要原则。该技术可通过导管介入(如血管成形术)或搭桥手术来实现。两者谁更具优势仍未确定。对于有症状的单支血管疾病,血管成形术可能是比搭桥手术更好的选择。对于双支血管冠状动脉疾病,尤其是左心室功能良好时,血管成形术也可能更受青睐。对于双支血管疾病患者,特别是累及左前降支近端并伴有糖尿病时,手术具有更好的长期效果。对于多支血管疾病,搭桥手术是首选方案,尽管该组患者血管成形术的初始效果可能非常令人满意。多支血管疾病患者接受血管成形术后,通过手术或重复血管成形术进行进一步干预的发生率很高。左主干疾病应通过搭桥手术治疗。随着冠状动脉疾病血管重建技术在导管介入和外科领域的不断进步,在冠状动脉疾病的管理中没有明确或通用的策略计划的空间。这两种技术相辅相成。成本考量在印度是一个主要因素。应在对冠状动脉解剖结构、潜在临床状况、当地经验、社会尤其是经济情况进行适当评估后做出选择。

相似文献

1
Angioplasty versus coronary artery by-pass surgery: a reappraisal.血管成形术与冠状动脉搭桥手术:重新评估
J Indian Med Assoc. 1999 Jul;97(7):271-5.
2
One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.冠状动脉旁路移植术与多系统疾病多支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年结局:来自随机临床试验个体患者数据的荟萃分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.049.
3
Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience.多支冠状动脉支架置入术与搭桥手术的临床和经济结果比较:美国单中心经验
Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):334-42. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.38.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease: a current perspective.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Jun;8(6):666-71. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.195644. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
5
Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.当前针对三支血管病变及左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术实践。来自SYNTAX导入期的见解。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.047. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
6
Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.微创冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术联合治疗双支冠状动脉疾病:一种新型杂交手术与“体外循环”双旁路移植术的两年随访
Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):563-70. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.118466.
7
Treatment decisions in stable coronary artery disease: insights from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.稳定型冠状动脉疾病的治疗决策:来自欧洲冠状动脉血运重建调查的见解
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;132(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.05.051.
8
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
9
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.多支冠状动脉疾病对单纯微创左前降支搭桥术后结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044.
10
One-year clinical results and total costs of drug-eluting stents implantation in multivessel coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架植入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的一年临床结果及总成本
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Aug;8(8):596-601. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32801051f4.