Kuhn P
Int J Psychoanal. 1999 Oct;80 ( Pt 5):943-59. doi: 10.1516/0020757991599179.
In 1982 Peter Swales claimed that Minna Bernays, Freud's sister-in-law, aborted Freud's child in Merano in September 1900. Letters published subsequently reveal flaws in Swales's hypothesis. Drawing on current literary theories the author recontextualises the 'aliquis slip' within a new narrative of the Freuds' 1900 summer holiday, revealing not an abortion crisis but Freud's momentary fear that his wife Martha was again pregnant. A chronological reconstruction of the production the 'aliquis slip' and Freud's financial error offers new ways of reading Freud's subsequently composed texts. A precision dating of the 'table d'hôte dream' allows it to be set within its syntagmatic chain, thereby suggesting Freud's marital crisis and bitterness at his failed professorial application. It is a cocaine anniversary dream dredging up a sixteen-year grudge against Martha and the recently elevated Professor Königstein, both of whom Freud still held responsible for his failure to best Koller in discovering the anaesthetic properties of cocaine in eye surgery.
1982年,彼得·斯韦尔斯声称,弗洛伊德的嫂子明娜·伯奈斯于1900年9月在梅拉诺打掉了弗洛伊德的孩子。随后发表的信件揭示了斯韦尔斯假设中的缺陷。作者运用当前的文学理论,在弗洛伊德一家1900年夏日度假的新叙事中重新审视了“某个口误”,揭示出这并非堕胎危机,而是弗洛伊德一时担心妻子玛莎再次怀孕。对“某个口误”的产生以及弗洛伊德财务失误进行按时间顺序的重构,为解读弗洛伊德随后创作的文本提供了新的方式。对“客饭梦”的精确日期确定使其能置于其组合链中,从而暗示了弗洛伊德的婚姻危机以及他对教授职位申请失败的痛苦。这是一个可卡因周年纪念梦,勾起了他对玛莎以及最近晋升的柯尼希斯坦教授长达16年的怨恨,弗洛伊德仍认为他们两人应对自己在眼外科手术中未能胜过科勒发现可卡因麻醉特性负责。