Mautner B
Int J Psychoanal. 1994 Apr;75 ( Pt 2):321-33.
Although there was only one specimen dream in the first draft of 'The Interpretation of Dreams' that Freud would describe as fully analysed, he removed his dream from the text on the insistence of his friend, Wilhelm Fliess. The content of this 'lost dream' has been one of the great mysteries in psychoanalytic history. In this paper the author, working from clues in Freud's letters to Fliess and elsewhere, demonstrates that Freud's submission to Fliess caused him great anguish. The author contends that rather than discarding the lost dream as it has been assumed he did, Freud dismembered, disguised and resurrected it, along with the entire dream analysis, in the essay 'Screen memories'. A reconstruction of the lost dream and Freud's analysis as it appeared in the first draft of 'The Interpretation of Dreams', is attempted. The fate of the lost dream was the catalysing element in the dissolution of Freud's relationship with Fliess, it is maintained. Along with the transferential aspects of his relationship with Fliess, Freud's personal circumstances and the realities of the historical moment in Vienna are considered as contributing to his state of mind at the time.
尽管在《梦的解析》初稿中只有一个样本梦被弗洛伊德描述为经过充分分析，但在朋友威廉·弗利斯的坚持下，他将这个梦从文本中删去了。这个“遗失的梦”的内容一直是精神分析史上的一大谜团。在本文中，作者依据弗洛伊德给弗利斯及其他地方的信件中的线索，证明弗洛伊德对弗利斯的屈从给他带来了巨大痛苦。作者认为，弗洛伊德并非如人们所认为的那样丢弃了这个遗失的梦，而是在《屏幕记忆》一文中对其进行了肢解、伪装并使其复活，同时还有整个梦的分析。本文尝试重构《梦的解析》初稿中出现的那个遗失的梦以及弗洛伊德的分析。有人认为，遗失的梦的命运是导致弗洛伊德与弗利斯关系破裂的催化因素。除了他与弗利斯关系中的移情方面，弗洛伊德的个人情况以及维也纳当时的历史现实也被认为对他当时的心境有影响。
