• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Diabetes care practices in primary care: results from two samples and three measurement sets.

作者信息

Glasgow R E, Boles S M, Calder D, Dreyer L, Bagdade J

机构信息

The AMC Cancer Research Center, Denver, Colorado (Dr Glasgow)

The Ore­gon Research Institute, Eugene (Dr Boles)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 1999 Sep-Oct;25(5):755-63. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500508.

DOI:10.1177/014572179902500508
PMID:10646472
Abstract

PURPOSE

There has been substantial recent interest in diabetes disease management interventions, guidelines, and care practices. As the vast majority of diabetes care occurs in primary care settings, it makes sense to evaluate current levels of recommended practices in different primary care settings.

METHODS

We report on two separate studies that included a combined total of 389 patients seen by over 30 different providers. Three different sets of recommended practices were assessed: (1) the ADA provider recognition measures, (2) the proposed Diabetes Quality Improvement Project measures, and (3) the state of Oregon Population-Based Guidelines for Diabetes.

RESULTS

In general, there was only a moderate level of adherence to recommended practices, and adherence was much lower for behavioral or patient-focused practices as contrasted with laboratory tests. There was considerable variability across providers and across different guidelines activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy and quality improvement implications and future research issues are discussed, including the need for studying different measurement approaches for evaluating guidelines adherence.

摘要

相似文献

1
Diabetes care practices in primary care: results from two samples and three measurement sets.
Diabetes Educ. 1999 Sep-Oct;25(5):755-63. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500508.
2
Physician process and patient outcome measures for diabetes care: relationships to organizational characteristics.糖尿病护理的医生诊疗过程与患者预后指标:与组织特征的关系
Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):840-50. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135809.92048.d9.
3
Canadian Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes Toward Understanding Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Screening.加拿大初级保健医生对理解糖尿病筛查临床实践指南的态度。
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Dec;40(6):580-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
Quality of Care of the Initial Patient Cohort of the Diabetes Collaborative Registry.糖尿病协作登记处初始患者队列的护理质量。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 11;6(8):e005999. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005999.
5
Using theory to improve low back pain care in Australian Aboriginal primary care: a mixed method single cohort pilot study.运用理论改善澳大利亚原住民初级保健中的腰痛护理:一项混合方法单队列试点研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 12;17:44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0441-z.
6
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines and asthma management practices among inner-city pediatric primary care providers.美国国立心肺血液研究所的指南以及市中心儿科初级保健提供者的哮喘管理实践。
Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):619-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.3.619.
7
Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care.电子临床提醒与原发性糖尿病护理质量
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Variation in office-based quality. A claims-based profile of care provided to Medicare patients with diabetes.门诊医疗质量的差异。为患有糖尿病的医疗保险患者提供的基于理赔数据的医疗概况。
JAMA. 1995 May 17;273(19):1503-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.19.1503.
9
Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.我们应该对谁进行剖析?审视初级保健提供者、提供者群体和医疗保健机构之间糖尿病护理实践的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102.
10
Provider, Patient, and Practice Factors Shape Hepatitis B Prevention and Management by Primary Care Providers.提供者、患者和实践因素影响初级保健提供者对乙型肝炎的预防和管理。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;51(7):626-631. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000738.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients', caregivers', and providers' perceived strategies for diabetes care.患者、护理人员及医疗服务提供者对糖尿病护理的认知策略。
Am J Health Behav. 2015 May;39(3):433-40. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.3.15.
2
Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes.使用慢性护理模式要素与更高质量的糖尿病护理相关。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;5(1):14-20. doi: 10.1370/afm.610.
3
A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care.一项旨在改善糖尿病护理的实用随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30425.x.
4
When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?患者及其医生何时能就糖尿病治疗目标和策略达成一致,这又会产生怎样的影响?
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Nov;18(11):893-902. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21132.x.
5
Practice guidelines and measurement: state-of-the-science.实践指南与测量:科学现状
Nurs Outlook. 2003 Mar-Apr;51(2):65-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6554(02)05459-3.