Hicks M H, Lam M S
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;23(4):415-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1005563918721.
The goal of this retrospective pilot study was to provide a naturalistic description of the decision-making process regarding dementia, a chronic illness. The hypothesis was that in-depth descriptions by caregivers in a community setting would provide a more comprehensive and realistic representation of decision-making in the case of chronic illness than has been provided by most models. Data were gathered from in-depth, qualitative interviews with seven Chinese-American families living in the Boston area and caring for an elderly family member with dementia. These were supplemented with interviews with medical professionals and ethnography done in the community regarding the care of elders with dementia. Based on the findings, this paper proposes a dynamic, more comprehensive model for the social process of decision-making which is particularly applicable to clinical and life situations of decision-making in the case of chronic illness. The model describes: 1) the decision-maker constellation, including multiple family members, professionals and service systems; 2) relationships between decision-makers as "allies" or "competitors"; 3) variations in the nature of the decision-making process; and 4) the interaction of decision-making with larger social, economic and cultural forces. Decision-making in the case of dementia is placed within the conceptual framework of the "social course" of chronic illness.
这项回顾性试点研究的目的是对痴呆症这一慢性疾病的决策过程进行自然主义描述。假设是,与大多数模型相比,社区环境中照顾者的深入描述将为慢性病情况下的决策提供更全面、更现实的呈现。数据来自对居住在波士顿地区、照顾患有痴呆症老年家庭成员的七个美籍华裔家庭进行的深入定性访谈。此外,还补充了与医学专业人员的访谈以及在社区中进行的关于痴呆症患者护理的人种志研究。基于这些发现,本文提出了一个动态的、更全面的社会决策过程模型,该模型特别适用于慢性病情况下临床和生活中的决策情境。该模型描述了:1)决策群体,包括多个家庭成员、专业人员和服务系统;2)决策者之间作为“盟友”或“竞争者”的关系;3)决策过程性质的变化;4)决策与更大的社会、经济和文化力量的相互作用。痴呆症情况下的决策被置于慢性病“社会进程”的概念框架内。