Fox K M, Henderson J R, Kaski J C, Sachse A, Kuester L, Wonnacott S
Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Heart. 2000 Feb;83(2):167-71. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.2.167.
To determine the efficacy and safety of the potassium channel blocker tedisamil versus placebo in the treatment of patients with stable angina.
Prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study. 203 patients first completed a seven day placebo run in. They were then randomised to receive 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tedisamil twice daily, or placebo. Treadmill exercise testing was carried out at baseline and after 14 days of double blind treatment.
Primary efficacy parameters were an increase in total exercise duration and a reduction of the sum of ST segment depression using six ECG leads at maximum workload at trough (12 hours after last medication). Secondary aims included increase in exercise time to onset of 0.1 mV ST segment depression, increase in exercise time to onset of any anginal pain, and reduction in ST segment depression in any of the six specified leads at maximum workload. These were all at trough. The same parameters were also assessed at peak concentrations (two hours after administration). Overall attacks of angina and the use of short acting nitrates were assessed from patient diaries.
Tedisamil led to a dose dependent prolongation of exercise duration (significant at all concentrations), an effect that was greater at peak than at trough. Treatment also led to a significant dose dependent reduction in the sum of ST segment depression at both trough and peak concentrations. Tedisamil also decreased (in a dose dependent way) the frequency of anginal attacks and the consumption of short acting nitrates, an improvement that became significant for all doses in the second treatment week. Adverse events with tedisamil were few. There was a pronounced rise in the incidence of diarrhoea with the 150 mg twice daily regimen. Bradycardic effects and increases in QT interval were dose dependent, but were no more evident at exercise than at rest.
Tedisamil, at doses of 50-100 mg twice daily, was found to be an effective antianginal and anti-ischaemic agent. At doses above 100 mg twice daily its main side effect, diarrhoea, becomes pronounced; therefore the 50-100 mg twice daily regimen appears to be appropriate.
确定钾通道阻滞剂替地沙米与安慰剂相比治疗稳定型心绞痛患者的疗效和安全性。
前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。203例患者首先完成为期7天的安慰剂导入期。然后将他们随机分为接受每日两次50毫克、100毫克或150毫克替地沙米,或安慰剂。在基线及双盲治疗14天后进行平板运动试验。
主要疗效参数为总运动持续时间增加,以及在谷值(最后一次用药后12小时)最大负荷时使用6个心电图导联测量的ST段压低总和减少。次要目标包括运动至0.1毫伏ST段压低发作时间增加、运动至任何心绞痛发作时间增加,以及在最大负荷时6个指定导联中任何一个导联的ST段压低减少。这些均在谷值时测量。相同参数也在峰浓度(给药后2小时)时评估。根据患者日记评估心绞痛的总体发作次数和短效硝酸盐的使用情况。
替地沙米导致运动持续时间呈剂量依赖性延长(在所有浓度下均显著),在峰浓度时的作用大于谷值时。治疗还导致在谷值和峰浓度时ST段压低总和均显著降低,且呈剂量依赖性。替地沙米还(以剂量依赖性方式)降低了心绞痛发作频率和短效硝酸盐的消耗量,在治疗第二周,所有剂量的这种改善均变得显著。替地沙米的不良事件较少。每日两次150毫克方案的腹泻发生率明显上升。心动过缓效应和QT间期延长呈剂量依赖性,但在运动时并不比休息时更明显。
发现每日两次50 - 100毫克剂量的替地沙米是一种有效的抗心绞痛和抗缺血药物。每日两次剂量超过100毫克时,其主要副作用腹泻会变得明显;因此,每日两次50 - 100毫克的方案似乎较为合适。