Boye S M, Rompré P P
Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada, H3G 1M8.
J Neurosci. 2000 Feb 1;20(3):1229-39. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-03-01229.2000.
Electrophysiological studies have shown that chronic treatment with haloperidol causes depolarization block (DB) of dopamine cells in anesthetized and paralyzed rats. It has been proposed that the emergence of DB underlies the therapeutic and side effects of this drug. However, the relevance of DB to the clinical actions of haloperidol has been questioned on the grounds that chronic drug-induced DB has not yet been demonstrated in freely moving animals. In this study, responding for rewarding electrical brain stimulation was used to assess the occurrence of DB in rats chronically treated with haloperidol or clozapine. The time course of the effects of acute haloperidol (7.8-500 microg/kg) and clozapine (5-40 mg/kg) and of withdrawal from chronic drug treatment on reward and performance measures were also characterized. Haloperidol and clozapine dose-dependently attenuated reward and performance, haloperidol producing a predominant suppression of performance, and clozapine preferentially attenuating reward. Chronic (21 d) treatment with haloperidol (500 microg/kg) caused responding to cease in the six rats tested, and repeated injection with apomorphine restored the behavior in all of them; such an effect of apomorphine was observed in only two of six rats treated acutely with the same dose of haloperidol. Chronic treatment with clozapine (20 mg/kg) increased reward thresholds, an effect that was reversed by apomorphine in chronically, but not acutely, treated rats. The times at which chronic haloperidol-treated rats resumed responding was positively correlated with indices of behavioral supersensitivity after withdrawal, suggesting that the effect of apomorphine was not caused by direct stimulation of upregulated postsynaptic receptors. These findings constitute the first behavioral evidence of DB in unanesthetized, freely moving animals treated chronically with antipsychotics. They also demonstrate that the neural substrates mediating reward and performance are functionally independent and differentially sensitive to haloperidol and clozapine.
电生理研究表明,在麻醉和瘫痪的大鼠中,长期使用氟哌啶醇会导致多巴胺能细胞的去极化阻滞(DB)。有人提出,DB的出现是该药物治疗作用和副作用的基础。然而,由于在自由活动的动物中尚未证实长期药物诱导的DB,因此DB与氟哌啶醇临床作用的相关性受到质疑。在本研究中,通过对奖励性脑电刺激的反应来评估长期接受氟哌啶醇或氯氮平治疗的大鼠中DB的发生情况。还对急性给予氟哌啶醇(7.8 - 500微克/千克)和氯氮平(5 - 40毫克/千克)以及停止长期药物治疗对奖励和行为表现指标的影响的时间进程进行了表征。氟哌啶醇和氯氮平均剂量依赖性地减弱奖励和行为表现,氟哌啶醇主要抑制行为表现,而氯氮平优先减弱奖励。长期(21天)给予氟哌啶醇(500微克/千克)导致接受测试的6只大鼠停止反应,重复注射阿扑吗啡可使所有大鼠恢复行为;而在急性给予相同剂量氟哌啶醇治疗的6只大鼠中,只有2只观察到阿扑吗啡的这种作用。长期给予氯氮平(20毫克/千克)会提高奖励阈值,这种作用在长期而非急性治疗的大鼠中可被阿扑吗啡逆转。长期接受氟哌啶醇治疗的大鼠恢复反应的时间与撤药后行为超敏反应指标呈正相关,这表明阿扑吗啡的作用不是由直接刺激上调的突触后受体引起的。这些发现构成了在未麻醉、自由活动的动物中长期接受抗精神病药物治疗后出现DB的首个行为学证据。它们还表明,介导奖励和行为表现的神经基质在功能上是独立的,并且对氟哌啶醇和氯氮平的敏感性不同。