• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effect of pimozide on self-stimulation threshold under a continuous and fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

作者信息

Boye S M, Rompré P P

机构信息

Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Que., Canada.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 1996 Aug;78(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00239-1.

DOI:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00239-1
PMID:8864057
Abstract

Rats implanted with a monopolar electrode in the medial mesencephalon and trained to press a lever to self-administer trains of stimulating pulses were tested under a continuous (CRF) and a fixed interval (FI-1s) schedule of reinforcement before and after systemic pimozide injection (0.35 mg/kg). As previously shown, this dose of pimozide caused reductions in maximal response rates and in the rewarding effectiveness of the stimulation. The magnitude of the attenuation in rewarding effectiveness was significantly greater under CRF than under FI conditions, an effect that can be attributed to the decrease in the number of earned rewards concomitant to a decrease in response rates. The present results show that the tighter control over reward density provided by the use of a FI schedule of reinforcement reduces the probability of artifactually measuring increases in reward thresholds following treatments that suppress response rates.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effect of pimozide on self-stimulation threshold under a continuous and fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.
Behav Brain Res. 1996 Aug;78(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00239-1.
2
Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Aug;42(4):563-77. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90001-v.
3
Acute effects of neuroleptics on brain self-stimulation thresholds in rats.抗精神病药物对大鼠脑自我刺激阈值的急性影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980 Jan;67(1):9-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00427589.
4
Dissociation of the attentional and motivational effects of pimozide on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation.匹莫齐特对奖励性脑刺激阈值的注意力和动机效应的分离
Neuropsychopharmacology. 1990 Feb;3(1):33-40.
5
Intermittent rewards raise self-stimulation thresholds.间歇性奖励会提高自我刺激阈值。
Behav Brain Res. 1996 Jan;74(1-2):57-64. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00150-6.
6
Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.电流和匹莫齐特对已准备好的和习得的自我刺激行为的主要影响在于行为表现而非奖励。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Dec;31(4):845-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90394-2.
7
Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms.颅内自我刺激的同时速率非依赖性和速率依赖性评估:多巴胺直接参与脑强化机制的证据。
Brain Res. 1979 Jun 29;169(3):499-512. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90399-8.
8
Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors.儿茶酚胺操作对三种不同自我刺激行为的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978 Sep;9(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90284-8.
9
The effects of pimozide and of reward omission on fixed-interval behavior of rats maintained by food and electrical brain stimulation.匹莫齐特及奖励缺失对通过食物和脑电刺激维持的大鼠固定间隔行为的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Aug;15(2):227-33. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90181-7.
10
Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics.奖赏、行为表现及自我刺激大鼠的反应强度法:验证与抗精神病药物
Physiol Behav. 1985 Dec;35(6):897-904. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90257-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral evidence of depolarization block of dopamine neurons after chronic treatment with haloperidol and clozapine.长期使用氟哌啶醇和氯氮平治疗后多巴胺能神经元去极化阻滞的行为学证据。
J Neurosci. 2000 Feb 1;20(3):1229-39. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-03-01229.2000.