Menges ES
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Feb;15(2):51-56. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01763-2.
This review of 95 plant population viability analyses (PVAs) reveals that most studies consider one species, only a few populations and are based on data collected for less than five years. Only five studies referred to themselves as PVAs. Plants offer numerous challenges, such as seed banks and periodic recruitment, but these can be answered with suitable data collection and modeling. New approaches, such as metapopulation models, inclusion of disturbance cycles, and integration of genetics and demography, are producing more realistic PVAs. Although exact solutions are fraught with limitations, plant PVAs can be useful in comparing management regimes, populations and microhabitats, and in using these results to guide conservation and management.
这篇对95个植物种群生存力分析(PVA)的综述表明,大多数研究只考虑一个物种、少数几个种群,且基于不到五年收集的数据。只有五项研究将自己称为PVA。植物面临诸多挑战,如种子库和周期性补充,但通过合适的数据收集和建模可以应对这些挑战。新方法,如集合种群模型、纳入干扰周期以及整合遗传学和种群统计学,正在产生更符合实际的PVA。尽管精确的解决方案存在诸多局限,但植物PVA在比较管理方案、种群和微生境,以及利用这些结果指导保护和管理方面可能会很有用。