Suppr超能文献

识别有违纪风险的囚犯:两种精神病态测量方法的比较。

Identifying inmates at risk for disciplinary infractions: a comparison of two measures of psychopathy.

作者信息

Edens J F, Poythress N G, Lilienfeld S O

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341-2447, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(4):435-43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<435::aid-bsl356>3.0.co;2-z.

Abstract

Poythress, Edens, and Lilienfeld (1998) recently reported a moderately strong correlation between Hare's (1991) Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and a newly developed self-report measure of psychopathy, the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) of Lilienfeld and Andrews (1996), in an ethnically diverse sample of 50 inmates from a youthful offender prison. The present study reports follow-up data regarding disciplinary infractions in this sample and examines the utility of the PCL-R and PPI for identifying those at risk for institutional misbehavior. Generally modest, but statistically significant, correlations were obtained between both measures and indices of aggressive institutional behavior. Multiple regression analyses revealed that both measures accounted for common variance in the criterion but that neither accounted for significant unique variance. Results are discussed in terms of the clinical utility of these measures in populations of young offenders.

摘要

波思雷斯、伊登斯和利连菲尔德(1998年)最近报告称,在一个来自青少年罪犯监狱的50名不同种族的囚犯样本中,黑尔(1991年)的《修订版精神病态量表》(PCL-R)与利连菲尔德和安德鲁斯(1996年)新开发的精神病态自我报告量表《精神病态人格问卷》(PPI)之间存在中度较强的相关性。本研究报告了该样本中违纪行为的后续数据,并检验了PCL-R和PPI在识别有机构不当行为风险者方面的效用。两种测量方法与攻击性机构行为指标之间的相关性一般适中,但具有统计学意义。多元回归分析表明,两种测量方法都解释了标准中的共同方差,但都没有解释显著的独特方差。本文根据这些测量方法在青少年罪犯群体中的临床效用对结果进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验