Edens John F, Poythress Norman G, Lilienfeld Scott O, Patrick Christopher J, Test Amy
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):86-91. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.86.
Recent evidence suggests that 2 largely orthogonal dimensions underpin the latent construct assessed by the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI; Lilienfeld & Andrews, 1996): Fearless Dominance (PPI-I) and Impulsive Antisociality (PPI-II). Relatively few data exist on the correlates of these 2 dimensions in offender samples, however. The present study examines the criterion-related validity of these 2 dimensions among male prison inmates (N = 131) in relation to the prediction of 3 categories of institutional maladjustment: aggressive misconduct, nonaggressive misconduct, and any misconduct. PPI-II significantly predicted each criterion type, with effect sizes of moderate magnitude, whereas PPI-I was essentially unrelated to these outcome measures.
近期证据表明,两个大致正交的维度构成了通过精神病态人格问卷(PPI;Lilienfeld & Andrews,1996)所评估的潜在结构:无畏支配(PPI-I)和冲动反社会性(PPI-II)。然而,关于这两个维度在罪犯样本中的相关数据相对较少。本研究考察了这两个维度在男性监狱囚犯(N = 131)中与三类机构适应不良预测相关的效标效度:攻击性行为不端、非攻击性行为不端以及任何行为不端。PPI-II显著预测了每种效标类型,效应量为中等程度,而PPI-I与这些结果指标基本无关。