Hasegawa O, Mimura E, Kirigaya N, Wada N, Tsumura M, Iino M, Matsumoto S
Department of Neurology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Japan.
No To Shinkei. 1999 Dec;51(12):1029-32.
A total of 122 patients were performed motor and sensory nerve conduction studies of the upper limb by two examiners (1. doctor, 2. medical technician) to know the inter-examiner reliability of nerve conduction measurements. Subjects contained normal individuals and various types of neuropathy patients. Motor nerve conduction studies were carried out in the median nerve, and antidromic sensory nerve conduction studies were performed in the median and ulnar nerves. F-wave latency of the median nerve and sensory conduction velocity between finger and wrist of the median and ulnar nerves presented the equal mean value between two examiners. A relatively good correlation between two examiners was pointed out in the distal motor latency and F-wave latency. Inappropriate measurements were caused by the differences in the site of placement of stimulating or recording electrodes and effects of submaximum stimuli or stimulus spread to other nerves. In sensory nerve conduction studies, especially in the ulnar nerve, careful attention should be paid to avoid the influence of motor artifact in giving supramaximum stimuli. Amplitude measurements showed larger inter-examiner difference than latency or velocity measurements. We reported the present condition of measurement reliability. We should do our best to minimize the error.
两名检查者(1. 医生,2. 医学技术员)对122例患者进行了上肢运动和感觉神经传导研究,以了解神经传导测量的检查者间可靠性。受试者包括正常个体和各类神经病变患者。对正中神经进行运动神经传导研究,对正中神经和尺神经进行逆向感觉神经传导研究。两名检查者测得的正中神经F波潜伏期以及正中神经和尺神经手指与腕部之间的感觉传导速度均值相等。两名检查者在远端运动潜伏期和F波潜伏期方面指出存在相对较好的相关性。刺激或记录电极放置部位的差异以及次最大刺激或刺激扩散至其他神经的影响会导致测量不当。在感觉神经传导研究中,尤其是在尺神经检查时,给予超强刺激时应特别注意避免运动伪迹的影响。与潜伏期或速度测量相比,振幅测量显示检查者间差异更大。我们报告了测量可靠性的现状。我们应尽力将误差降至最低。