Leung Brian, Forbes Mark R, Houle David
Am Nat. 2000 Jan;155(1):101-115. doi: 10.1086/303298.
Researchers have suggested fluctuating asymmetry (FA) as an indicator of environmental stress and have usually tested this assertion by examining relations between FA of single traits and stress. Fluctuating asymmetry stress relations are real but are typically weak and difficult to detect. Researchers would like to maximize the probability of detecting FA-stress relations when they exist. We assert that analyses based on the FA of multiple traits may provide better methods for detecting stress. In this article, we used computer simulations to compare the ability of six analyses to detect differences in FA between stressed and unstressed populations. We show that the optimal analysis depends upon the underlying form of the FA distributions. We also show that two of the analyses had inflated Type I errors in some situations. Finally, we quantify the advantage of our preferred analysis over those of single-trait FA in detecting stress.
研究人员提出,波动不对称性(FA)可作为环境压力的一个指标,并且通常通过检验单一性状的FA与压力之间的关系来验证这一论断。波动不对称性与压力之间的关系是真实存在的,但通常很微弱且难以察觉。研究人员希望在存在FA-压力关系时,将检测到这种关系的概率最大化。我们认为,基于多个性状的FA进行分析,可能会为检测压力提供更好的方法。在本文中,我们使用计算机模拟来比较六种分析方法检测受压力群体和未受压力群体之间FA差异的能力。我们表明,最优分析方法取决于FA分布的潜在形式。我们还表明,其中两种分析方法在某些情况下存在第一类错误膨胀的问题。最后,我们量化了我们所偏好的分析方法相对于单一性状FA分析方法在检测压力方面的优势。