Tsu V, Tyshchenko D K
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;181 Suppl 1:S188-92. doi: 10.1086/315564.
In response to concerns about diphtheria vaccine efficacy, a case-control study was undertaken in Ukraine in 1996 to determine whether those recently immunized were indeed protected from disease, whether multiple doses were more protective, whether contact with children was related to disease, and whether there were detectable differences in protective efficacy between Western and Russian vaccines. In each of the three sites (one rural and two urban), 60 adults with laboratory-confirmed cases of diphtheria were identified from health center records along with 2 adult controls, who were matched to the case by neighborhood. Demographic and vaccination data were gathered from health center records. Using conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios, it was determined that cases were more likely to have had no vaccine in the year prior to the index data (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-9.0), for a vaccine efficacy of 80%. Two doses gave greater protection, living with children increased disease risk, and no difference was detectable between the Russian and Western vaccines.
针对对白喉疫苗效力的担忧,1996年在乌克兰开展了一项病例对照研究,以确定近期接种疫苗者是否确实受到疾病保护、多剂疫苗是否更具保护作用、与儿童接触是否与疾病有关,以及西方疫苗和俄罗斯疫苗在保护效力上是否存在可检测到的差异。在三个地点(一个农村和两个城市)中的每一个,从卫生中心记录中识别出60例实验室确诊的白喉成年病例,并挑选出2名成年对照者,他们按邻里关系与病例进行匹配。从卫生中心记录中收集人口统计学和疫苗接种数据。使用条件逻辑回归来估计比值比,结果确定病例在索引数据前一年更有可能未接种疫苗(比值比为5.0;95%置信区间为2.8 - 9.0),疫苗效力为80%。两剂疫苗提供了更大的保护,与儿童同住会增加患病风险,并且俄罗斯疫苗和西方疫苗之间未检测到差异。