Becker C R, Jakobs T F, Aydemir S, Becker A, Knez A, Schoepf U J, Bruening R, Haberl R, Reiser M F
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Feb;174(2):543-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740543.
We compared electron beam CT with conventional CT to determine the best method for the assessment of the coronary calcium score. We used conventional CT to examine symptomatic and asymptomatic patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.
One hundred sixty male patients underwent electron beam CT and helical CT with a pitch of 1 (n = 30) and 2 (n = 30) and using a single-slice mode with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) prospective ECG triggering. In another 50 patients, we determined reproducibility for repeated scanning using electron beam CT. For all images, we derived the calcium score according to the Agatston method. We performed regression analysis and determined mean variability. Mean variability was calculated as the ratio of the absolute difference to the mean of the corresponding calcium scores.
The correlation coefficients for electron beam CT and all conventional CT modes were very high (range, 0.93-0.98). The mean variability was highest in the helical mode with a pitch of 2 (61.4%) and lowest for the single-slice mode with prospective ECG triggering (25.4%). For repeated electron beam CT, the correlation coefficient and mean variability were 0.99 and 22.1%, respectively.
ECG-triggered single-slice conventional CT had the best agreement with electron beam CT calcium scores.
