Weininger M, Ritter C O, Beer M, Hahn D, Beissert M
Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg.
Rofo. 2007 Sep;179(9):938-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963296.
To evaluate the variability of coronary calcium scores depending on the image reconstruction interval using a 64-slice CT scanner.
30 patients (18 male, 12 female; mean age 57 +/- 9 yrs; mean heart rate 66 +/- 10 bpm) underwent coronary calcium scoring using a 64-slice CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen) and a standardized scanning protocol. Oral beta-blockers were administered to 12 patients with a baseline heart rate > 70 bpm. Images were reconstructed in 10 % increments from 10 - 100 % of the RR interval. Two blinded experienced observers independently calculated Agatston (AS), calcium mass (MS) and volume scores (VS) for every reconstructed image series. The results were compared to similar studies for 16-slice CT scanners.
The mean values and mean coefficients of variation among all patients were as follows: AS, 397 +/- 829, 109 % MS, 88 +/- 225, 154 % VS, 335 +/- 669, 100 %. Regarding the reconstruction intervals, the mean coefficients of variation were as follows: 107 % (AS), 97 % (VS), 116 % (MS). No specific image reconstruction interval with statistically significant lower variability for each score could be identified. High inter-observer agreement was achieved (K = 0.98). With statistical significance (p < 0.05) 10/30 patients (pts) were able to be allocated to more than one risk group (RG): 6 pts = 2 RG; 3 pts = 3 RG; 1 pts = 4 RG. The scores for 5/30 patients were zero for at least one reconstruction interval, but further reconstructions revealed calcifications. The number of patients assignable to different risk groups was significantly lower compared to published data using a 16-slice scanner (p < 0.05).
Coronary calcium scores determined using a 64-slice scanner display a wide range of variability depending on the image reconstruction interval as already described for 16-slice CT scanners. However, compared to previous studies, our data indicate that this vendor's generation of scanners reduces the influence of score variations on the risk stratification.
使用64层CT扫描仪评估冠状动脉钙化积分随图像重建间隔的变异性。
30例患者(男性18例,女性12例;平均年龄57±9岁;平均心率66±10次/分钟)使用64层CT扫描仪(Somatom Sensation 64,西门子医疗解决方案公司,埃尔朗根)及标准化扫描方案进行冠状动脉钙化评分。对12例基线心率>70次/分钟的患者给予口服β受体阻滞剂。图像在RR间期的10%至100%范围内以10%的增量进行重建。两名经验丰富的盲法观察者分别对每个重建图像系列计算阿加斯顿(AS)、钙质量(MS)和体积评分(VS)。将结果与16层CT扫描仪的类似研究进行比较。
所有患者的平均值及平均变异系数如下:AS,397±829,109%;MS,88±225,154%;VS,335±669,100%。关于重建间隔,平均变异系数如下:107%(AS),97%(VS),116%(MS)。未发现每个评分具有统计学显著更低变异性的特定图像重建间隔。观察者间一致性较高(K = 0.98)。具有统计学显著性(p < 0.05)的是,10/30例患者能够被分配到不止一个风险组(RG):6例患者 = 2个RG;3例患者 = 3个RG;1例患者 = 4个RG。30例患者中有5例在至少一个重建间隔时评分归零,但进一步重建显示有钙化。与使用16层扫描仪的已发表数据相比,可分配到不同风险组的患者数量显著更低(p < 0.05)。
使用64层扫描仪确定的冠状动脉钙化积分随图像重建间隔显示出广泛的变异性,这与16层CT扫描仪的情况类似。然而,与先前研究相比,我们的数据表明该厂商生产的扫描仪降低了评分变异对风险分层的影响。