Rajpar S F, Smith M A, Cooke M W
University of Birmingham, Coventry.
J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;17(1):18-21. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.1.18.
To determine the reasons for choosing between primary care out of hours centres and accident and emergency (A&E) departments for patients with primary care problems.
Interviews using a semistructured approach of samples of patients attending A&E departments and general practitioner (GP) out of hours centres for primary care problems.
102 patient interviews were undertaken. Sixty two per cent of A&E attenders were unemployed compared with 41% of out of hours attenders. White people were more likely to attend A&E departments and Asians the out of hours centre (p<0.01) and unemployed were more likely to attend A&E departments (70% v 30%). Some 46.3% of A&E department attenders had not contacted their GP before attending; 81.3% of first time users of the out of hours centre found out about it on the day of interview. Those attending A&E thought waiting times at the out of hours centre would be 6.3 hours (median) compared with a median perceived time of 2.9 hours by those actually attending the out of hours centre. Actual time was actually much less.
Once patients have used the GP out of hours centre they are more likely to use it again. Education should be targeted at young adults, the unemployed and white people. Patients should be encouraged to contact their GP before A&E department attendance for non-life threatening conditions. Waiting time perception may be an important reason for choice of service.
确定有初级保健问题的患者在选择非工作时间的初级保健中心和急诊部门时的原因。
采用半结构化方法对因初级保健问题前往急诊部门和全科医生(GP)非工作时间中心就诊的患者样本进行访谈。
进行了102次患者访谈。前往急诊部门就诊的患者中有62%失业,而前往非工作时间中心就诊的患者中这一比例为41%。白人更倾向于前往急诊部门,而亚洲人更倾向于前往非工作时间中心(p<0.01),失业者更倾向于前往急诊部门(70%对30%)。约46.3%前往急诊部门就诊的患者在就诊前未联系过他们的全科医生;81.3%首次使用非工作时间中心的患者是在访谈当天得知该中心的。前往急诊部门就诊的患者认为非工作时间中心的等待时间中位数为6.3小时,而实际前往非工作时间中心就诊的患者感知的等待时间中位数为2.9小时。实际等待时间要少得多。
患者一旦使用过非工作时间的全科医生中心,就更有可能再次使用。教育应针对年轻人、失业者和白人。对于非危及生命的情况,应鼓励患者在前往急诊部门之前先联系他们的全科医生。对等待时间的认知可能是选择服务的一个重要原因。