Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗住院环境中精神疾病的筛查:医院焦虑抑郁量表与一般健康问卷-12的比较

Screening for psychiatric illness in the palliative care inpatient setting: a comparison between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the General Health Questionnaire-12.

作者信息

Le Fevre P, Devereux J, Smith S, Lawrie S M, Cornbleet M

机构信息

Royal Edinburgh Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 1999 Sep;13(5):399-407. doi: 10.1191/026921699671260095.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) as a screening instrument for the detection of psychiatric disorders in a palliative care inpatient setting. The results from the HADS and GHQ were compared to diagnoses generated from a semistructured psychiatric interview (Revised Clinical Interview Schedule) using standard receiver operating characteristic analysis. The study was conducted at the Marie Curie Centre, Edinburgh, a 37-bedded palliative care inpatient facility. Out of a total of 282 admissions during the study period, 79 took part in the study. The remainder of patients either refused (69) or were too unwell to participate (134). The HADS was found to be an effective screening tool for identifying depression, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92. A suggested cut-off of 20 would have a sensitivity of 0.77, a specificity of 0.85 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.48. There was no significant difference between the two subscales in their ability to detect depressive illnesses, although there was a trend for the anxiety subscale to perform better (P < 0.15). The GHQ did not perform as well as the HADS in this type of population. In view of this, it can be concluded that the HADS is a valid screening tool for psychiatric disorders, particularly depression, in a palliative care setting.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)与12项一般健康问卷(GHQ - 12)作为姑息治疗住院患者精神障碍筛查工具的性能。使用标准的受试者工作特征分析,将HADS和GHQ的结果与通过半结构化精神科访谈(修订临床访谈时间表)得出的诊断结果进行比较。该研究在爱丁堡的玛丽居里中心进行,这是一家拥有37张床位的姑息治疗住院机构。在研究期间的282例入院患者中,79例参与了研究。其余患者要么拒绝参与(69例),要么病情太重无法参与(134例)。结果发现,HADS是识别抑郁症的有效筛查工具,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.92。建议的临界值为20时,灵敏度为0.77,特异度为0.85,阳性预测值(PPV)为0.48。两个分量表在检测抑郁性疾病的能力上没有显著差异,尽管焦虑分量表有表现更好的趋势(P < 0.15)。在这类人群中,GHQ的表现不如HADS。鉴于此,可以得出结论,HADS是姑息治疗环境中精神障碍尤其是抑郁症的有效筛查工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验