Kovavisarach E, Vanitchanon P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rajavithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Dec;67(3):157-61. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00159-9.
To compare glove perforation between the single- and double-gloving method in cesarean section.
Three hundred primary surgeons selected at random to be two equal groups--single and double gloving in cesarean section--at Rajavithi Hospital from 1 November 1997 to 31 March 1998. The gloves were tested by immersing in water. The level of statistical significance was noted at P < 0.05.
The prevalence of glove perforation was 10.67% and 2% in single- and double-inner glove, respectively, with significant difference.
The double-gloving method had a significant benefit in protecting the primary surgeons' hands from exposure to blood compared with the single-gloving method in cesarean section.
比较剖宫产中单手套法和双手套法的手套穿孔情况。
1997年11月1日至1998年3月31日，在拉贾维蒂医院随机挑选300名主刀医生，分为剖宫产中单手套组和双手套组，每组人数相等。将手套浸入水中进行测试。统计学显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。
单手套组和双手套组中内层手套的穿孔发生率分别为10.67%和2%，差异有统计学意义。
与剖宫产中的单手套法相比，双手套法在保护主刀医生的手不接触血液方面有显著益处。
