Suppr超能文献

多巴胺拮抗、抗胆碱能及γ-氨基丁酸能对陈述性和程序性记忆功能的影响。

Dopamine-antagonistic, anticholinergic, and GABAergic effects on declarative and procedural memory functions.

作者信息

Rammsayer T H, Rodewald S, Groh D

机构信息

Georg Elias Mueller Institute for Psychology, University of Goettingen, Gosslerstr. 14, D-37073, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jan;9(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00045-2.

Abstract

Declarative and procedural memory functions are related to dissociable neuroanatomic substrates. In the present study differential effects of pharmacologically induced changes in dopaminergic, GABAergic, and cholinergic activity in the brain on declarative (object and face recognition, immediate and delayed word recall) and procedural memory processes (compensatory tracking) were investigated. In a double-blind design, either 3 mg of haloperidol, 11 mg of midazolam, 1 mg of scopolamine, or placebo were administered to 80 healthy volunteers randomly assigned to one of the four drug conditions. Although all three drugs produced a detrimental effect on immediate and delayed word recall, recall performance was substantially more impaired by the benzodiazepine midazolam than by either haloperidol or scopolamine. While recognition of faces was affected by neither of the drugs, performance on object recognition was significantly decreased by midazolam as compared to placebo. Procedural learning was markedly impaired by all drugs but, again, the observed effect was most pronounced with midazolam. Additional analyses of measures of subjective activation, cortical arousal, and psychomotor performance argued against the assumption that the observed memory-impairing effects were secondary to drug-induced sedation. The overall pattern of results revealed that memory processes are much more susceptible to changes in GABAergic than in dopaminergic or cholinergic neurotransmitter activity. Furthermore, the present findings point to the conclusion that the modulating effects of dopaminergic, GABAergic, and cholinergic neurotransmitter systems on declarative and procedural memory functions are less specific than suggested by neuropsychological studies in patients.

摘要

陈述性记忆和程序性记忆功能与可分离的神经解剖学基质相关。在本研究中,研究了大脑中多巴胺能、GABA能和胆碱能活性的药理学诱导变化对陈述性记忆(物体和面部识别、即时和延迟单词回忆)和程序性记忆过程(补偿性追踪)的不同影响。在双盲设计中,将3毫克氟哌啶醇、11毫克咪达唑仑、1毫克东莨菪碱或安慰剂给予80名健康志愿者,他们被随机分配到四种药物条件之一。尽管所有三种药物都对即时和延迟单词回忆产生了有害影响,但苯二氮卓类药物咪达唑仑对回忆表现的损害比氟哌啶醇或东莨菪碱更严重。虽然两种药物都未影响面部识别,但与安慰剂相比,咪达唑仑显著降低了物体识别的表现。所有药物都显著损害了程序性学习,但同样,观察到的效果在咪达唑仑中最为明显。对主观激活、皮层唤醒和精神运动表现测量的进一步分析反对了观察到的记忆损害效应是药物诱导镇静的继发效应这一假设。结果的总体模式表明,记忆过程对GABA能变化的敏感性远高于多巴胺能或胆碱能神经递质活性的变化。此外,目前的研究结果表明,多巴胺能、GABA能和胆碱能神经递质系统对陈述性和程序性记忆功能的调节作用不如对患者的神经心理学研究所表明的那样具有特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验