Brunner-La Rocca H P, Rickli H, Weilenmann D, Duru F, Candinas R
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):32-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00647.x.
Automatic mode switching from DDD(R) to DDI(R) or VVI(R) pacing modes has improved dual chamber pacing in patients at high risk for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of ventricular pacing rate adaptation after mode switching. We conducted a single-blinded, crossover study in 15 patients (58 +/- 21 years) with a DDD pacemaker who had AV block and normal sinus node function to investigate the influence of pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate during low intensity exercise. Patients performed two tests (A/B) of low intensity treadmill exercise (0.5 W/kg) in randomized order. They initially walked for 6 minutes while paced in DDD mode. The pacing mode was then switched to VVI with a pacing rate of either 70 beats/min (test A) or matched to the intrinsic heart rate (95 +/- 11 beats/min test B). Respiratory gas exchange variables were determined and patients classified the effort before and after mode switching on a Borg scale from 6 to 20. Percentage changes of respiratory gas exchange measurements were significantly larger (O2 consumption: -8.2 +/- 5.0% vs. -0.6 +/- 7.2%; ventilatory equivalent of CO2 exhalation: 5.3 +/- 4.9% vs. 1.5 +/- 4.3%; respiratory exchange ratio: 7.0 +/- 2.2% vs. 3.5 +/- 3.0%; end-tidal CO2: -5.7 +/- 2.9% vs. -1.8 +/- 2.7%; all P < 0.01) and the increase in subjective assessment of the effort tended to be higher (mean increase on Borg scale: 1.6 +/- 1.9 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = 0.07) after heart rate unadjusted than after adjusted mode switching. Mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing is better tolerated and gas exchange measurements are less influenced if ventricular pacing rate is adjusted to the level of physical activity. Thus, pacing rate adjustment should be considered as part of automatic mode switch algorithms.
从DDD(R)自动切换至DDI(R)或VVI(R)起搏模式改善了室上性快速心律失常高危患者的双腔起搏。然而,关于模式切换后心室起搏频率适应性的影响却知之甚少。我们对15例(年龄58±21岁)植入DDD起搏器、患有房室传导阻滞且窦房结功能正常的患者进行了一项单盲交叉研究,以调查低强度运动期间起搏频率适应固有心率的影响。患者以随机顺序进行两项低强度跑步机运动(0.5W/kg)测试(A/B)。他们最初在DDD模式下起搏时行走6分钟。然后将起搏模式切换为VVI,起搏频率为70次/分钟(测试A)或与固有心率匹配(测试B为95±11次/分钟)。测定呼吸气体交换变量,并让患者根据Borg量表从6至20对模式切换前后的运动强度进行分级。心率未调整时,呼吸气体交换测量值的百分比变化显著更大(耗氧量:-8.2±5.0%对-0.6±7.2%;呼出二氧化碳的通气当量:5.3±4.9%对1.5±4.3%;呼吸交换率:7.0±2.2%对3.5±3.0%;呼气末二氧化碳:-5.7±2.9%对-1.8±2.7%;所有P<0.01),且主观运动强度评估的增加在心率未调整时往往更高(Borg量表平均增加:1.6±1.9对1.1±1.8,P=0.07)。从DDD切换至VVI起搏模式时,如果心室起搏频率根据体力活动水平进行调整,则耐受性更好,气体交换测量受影响更小。因此,起搏频率调整应被视为自动模式切换算法的一部分。