Brembilla-Perrot B, Houriez P, Claudon O, Preiss J P, Beurrier D, Louis P, Terrier de la Chaise A
Department of Cardiology, CHU of Brabois, Nancy, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00649.x.
The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) has recently confirmed the role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) to identify the high risk patients of sudden death after myocardial infarction and to prevent this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term reproducibility of PVS in these patients. Thirty patients with coronary heart disease without spontaneous documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent two programmed stimulations in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug treatment between 2 and 6 years (mean 4 years). No patient had a myocardial infarction or intervening cardiac surgery during this period. The protocol of study was similar using up to three extrastimuli in two sites of the right ventricle, delivered in sinus rhythm and driven rhythm (600 ms, 400 ms, respectively). On the first PVS, 17 patients had inducible sustained VT (group I). Thirteen patients did not have inducible VT (group II). On the second PVS all group I patients but one had inducible VT, but the cycle length was significantly modified in 11. In group II, five patients had inducible VT and in the other patients the PVS remained negative. In conclusion, in patients with coronary heart disease, but without documented VT, the long-term reproducibility of PVS was excellent in those with inducible VT (94%); the patients remain at risk of VT and a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator could be considered. In patients with initially negative study, reproducibility of PVS was lower (61.5%), probably because of the progressive remodeling after myocardial infarction. Therefore, the occurrence of new symptoms in patients with previously negative study requires a second programmed ventricular stimulation.
多中心自动除颤器植入试验(MADIT)最近证实了程控心室刺激(PVS)在识别心肌梗死后猝死高危患者及预防该风险方面的作用。本研究的目的是评估PVS在这些患者中的长期可重复性。30例无自发记录的持续性室性心动过速(VT)的冠心病患者在2至6年(平均4年)内未接受抗心律失常药物治疗的情况下接受了两次程控刺激。在此期间,无患者发生心肌梗死或接受心脏介入手术。研究方案类似,在右心室两个部位使用多达三个额外刺激,分别在窦性心律和驱动心律(分别为600毫秒、400毫秒)下进行。在首次PVS时,17例患者可诱发出持续性VT(I组)。13例患者未诱发出VT(II组)。在第二次PVS时,I组除1例患者外所有患者均可诱发出VT,但11例患者的心动周期长度有显著改变。在II组中,5例患者可诱发出VT,其他患者的PVS结果仍为阴性。总之,在无记录VT的冠心病患者中,可诱发出VT的患者PVS的长期可重复性极佳(94%);这些患者仍有VT风险,可考虑植入预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器。在初始检查结果为阴性的患者中,PVS的可重复性较低(61.5%),可能是由于心肌梗死后的进行性重塑。因此,先前检查结果为阴性的患者出现新症状时需要再次进行程控心室刺激。