Suppr超能文献

定义室性心动过速消融的结果:程控心室刺激的时间和价值。

Defining the Outcome of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Timing and Value of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation.

机构信息

From the Arrhythmia Unit and Electrophysiology Laboratories, Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005602.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is effective to prevent arrhythmia episode-related implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. However, recurrences in noninducible patients at programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) are substantial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From May 2013 to September 2015, 218 PVSs were performed 6 days (5-7) after ablation (186 noninvasive programmed stimulations and 32 invasive PVS) in 210 consecutive patients (ischemic, 48%; median left ventricular ejection fraction, 37%; syncope, 35% with trauma associated 6%), while patients were awake and under β-blocker therapy. After ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillators were programmed according to noninvasive programmed stimulations results (class A-noninducible; class B-nondocumented inducible VT; and class C-documented inducible VT), with high and delayed VT detection intervals. Concordance between PVS end procedure and PVS day 6 was 67%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were higher for PVS day 6 (53% and 88% versus 43% and 71%). Ischemic and patients with preserved ejection fraction showed the highest negative predictive value (91% and 96%). Among 46 of 174 (26%) noninducible patients at PVS end procedure, but inducible at day 6, 59% had VT recurrence at 1-year follow-up; recurrences were 9% when both studies were noninducible. There were no inappropriate shocks; incidence of syncope was 3%; and none was harmful. The rate of appropriate shocks per patient per month according to noninvasive programmed stimulations results was significantly reduced, comparing the month before and after ablation (class A: 2 [0.75-4] versus 0; class B: 2 [1-4] versus 0; class C: 2 [1-4] versus 0; <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PVS at day 6 predicts VT recurrence more accurately allowing to identify patients who might benefit from a redo ablation and addressing implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming.

摘要

背景

导管消融术治疗室性心动过速(VT)可有效预防与心律失常事件相关的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)电击。然而,在程控心室刺激(PVS)中,非诱发性患者的复发率仍然很高。

方法和结果

2013 年 5 月至 2015 年 9 月,210 例连续患者(缺血性,48%;中位左心室射血分数,37%;晕厥,35%伴创伤相关 6%)在消融后 6 天(5-7 天)进行了 218 次 PVS(186 次非侵入性程控刺激和 32 次侵入性 PVS),患者处于清醒状态并接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。消融后,根据非侵入性程控刺激结果(A 级:非诱发性;B 级:无记录的诱发性 VT;C 级:有记录的诱发性 VT)对 ICD 进行程控,检测间期高且延迟。PVS 结束时与 PVS 第 6 天的一致性为 67%。PVS 第 6 天的阳性预测值和阴性预测值较高(53%和 88%,而 43%和 71%)。缺血性和射血分数保留患者的阴性预测值最高(91%和 96%)。在 174 例(26%)非诱发性患者中,PVS 结束时非诱发性但在第 6 天诱发性,59%在 1 年随访时出现 VT 复发;当两项研究均为非诱发性时,复发率为 9%。无不适当的电击;晕厥发生率为 3%;无有害。与消融前相比,根据非侵入性程控刺激结果,每个患者每月的适当电击次数明显减少(A 级:2 [0.75-4] 与 0;B 级:2 [1-4] 与 0;C 级:2 [1-4] 与 0;<0.001)。

结论

PVS 第 6 天的预测结果更准确,可以识别出可能从再次消融中获益的患者,并对 ICD 进行编程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验