Turitto G, Fontaine J M, Ursell S, Caref E B, Bekheit S, el-Sherif N
State University of New York, Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203.
Am J Med. 1990 Jan;88(1N):35N-41N.
Programmed stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction, and signal-averaged electrocardiography were performed in patients with organic heart disease and spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) to determine the role of these techniques in risk stratification and management.
The study consisted of 90 patients: 63 had coronary artery disease and 27 had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Radionuclide ventriculography, signal-averaged electrocardiography, and programmed electrical stimulation were performed in all patients within 48 hours of index ambulatory electrocardiography.
Fifty-three patients (59%) had an ejection fraction less than 40%. Programmed stimulation induced sustained monomorphic VT in 22 patients (24%), ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 10 patients (11%), and no sustained VT/VF in 58 patients (64%). The signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) showed late potentials in 23 patients (26%). Sustained monomorphic VT could be induced in 65% of patients with late potentials and in 10% of those without late potentials. There was no case of inducible sustained monomorphic VT in 33 patients with no late potentials and an ejection fraction of 40% or greater. All patients with induced sustained monomorphic VT received antiarrhythmic therapy guided by the results of programmed stimulation. All 58 patients with no induced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and eight patients with induced VF were discharged without receiving antiarrhythmic drugs. During a follow-up of 30 +/- 10 months, the three-year sudden death rate was 19% in patients with induced sustained VT, 0% in those with induced VF, and 9% in those with no induced sustained VT/VF. The three-year sudden death rate was the same (7%) in patients with no induced sustained VT/VF, both in those with an ejection fraction of 40% or greater or less than 40%. On the other hand, the three-year total cardiac mortality was significantly higher (27%) in those patients with ejection fractions less than 40% compared to those with ejection fractions of 40% or greater (7%).
It is concluded that the signal-averaged ECG, ejection fraction, and programmed stimulation could be used for the risk stratification and management of patients with organic heart disease and nonsustained VT as follows: (1) Patients with no late potentials and with an ejection fraction of 40% or greater do not require invasive evaluation or antiarrhythmic therapy, since the incidences of induced VT and sudden death are very low. (2) Patients with late potentials as well as patients without late potentials but with an ejection fraction of less than 40% may be advised to undergo electrophysiologic evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对患有器质性心脏病及自发性非持续性室性心动过速(VT)的患者进行程控刺激、左心室射血分数及信号平均心电图检查,以确定这些技术在危险分层及治疗中的作用。
本研究包含90例患者:63例患有冠状动脉疾病,27例患有特发性扩张型心肌病。在首次动态心电图检查的48小时内,对所有患者进行放射性核素心室造影、信号平均心电图及程控电刺激检查。
53例患者(59%)射血分数低于40%。程控刺激诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速的有22例患者(24%),诱发出心室颤动(VF)的有10例患者(11%),未诱发出持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动的有58例患者(64%)。信号平均心电图(ECG)显示23例患者(26%)存在晚电位。有晚电位的患者中65%可诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速,无晚电位的患者中10%可诱发出。33例无晚电位且射血分数为40%或更高的患者中无1例诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速。所有诱发出持续性单形性室性心动过速的患者均根据程控刺激结果接受抗心律失常治疗。所有58例未诱发出持续性室性心律失常的患者及8例诱发出心室颤动的患者未接受抗心律失常药物即出院。在30±10个月的随访期间,诱发出持续性室性心动过速的患者三年猝死率为19%,诱发出心室颤动的患者为0%,未诱发出持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动的患者为9%。未诱发出持续性室性心动过速/心室颤动的患者,无论射血分数是40%或更高还是低于40%,三年猝死率均相同(7%)。另一方面,射血分数低于40%的患者三年总心脏死亡率(27%)显著高于射血分数为40%或更高的患者(7%)。
得出结论,信号平均心电图、射血分数及程控刺激可用于患有器质性心脏病及非持续性室性心动过速患者的危险分层及治疗,如下:(1)无晚电位且射血分数为40%或更高的患者无需进行侵入性评估或抗心律失常治疗,因为诱发出室性心动过速及猝死的发生率非常低。(2)有晚电位的患者以及无晚电位但射血分数低于40%的患者可建议进行电生理评估。(摘要截断于400字)