Biedenbach D J, Lewis M T, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;35(4):277-83. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00098-x.
The degree of activity of several beta-lactam antimicrobial agents was assessed in Malaysia (four medical centers) and Singapore (two medical centers) tested against 570 clinical isolates. The organisms were tested locally by the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) method, validated by concurrent use of quality assurance strains (94.1% accurate performance overall). Ten groups of bacteria were tested against cefepime, cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin/tazobactam, oxacillin, and imipenem. Among the tested Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., the occurrence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing phenotypes was 5.6-7.0% and 36.7-38.0%, respectively. These strains remained most susceptible (97.5-100.0%) to cefepime and imipenem. Ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacter spp. (21.4% resistant), Citrobacter spp. (15.0%), indole-positive Proteus spp. (6.0%), and Serratia spp. (9.7%) were not resistant to cefepime, and only one strain was resistant to imipenem. Imipenem was generally most potent against non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli such as Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All tested beta-lactams were active against the oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci, except ceftazidime (MIC90, 12 micrograms/mL; 63.2-84.8% susceptibility rates). Overall spectrums of activity (rank by % resistance) favored imipenem (3.5%) > cefepime (7.7%) > cefpirome (8.9%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (13.2%) > ceftriaxone (14.7%) > ceftazidime (16.9%). No significant differences in resistance patterns were noted between monitored nations, and these results indicate emerging, elevated rates of resistance versus the studied broad-spectrum beta-lactams in Malaysia and Singapore. Results provide benchmark data for future studies using quantitative methods to determine antimicrobial resistance in these geographic areas.
在马来西亚(四个医疗中心)和新加坡(两个医疗中心),对570株临床分离菌株进行了测试,以评估几种β-内酰胺类抗菌药物的活性程度。这些菌株在当地采用Etest(AB BIODISK,瑞典索尔纳)方法进行测试,并通过同时使用质量保证菌株进行验证(总体性能准确率为94.1%)。针对头孢吡肟、头孢匹罗、头孢他啶、头孢曲松、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、苯唑西林和亚胺培南,对十组细菌进行了测试。在测试的大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌属中,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶表型的发生率分别为5.6 - 7.0%和3&7 - 38.0%。这些菌株对头孢吡肟和亚胺培南仍然最敏感(97.5 - 100.0%)。对头孢他啶耐药的肠杆菌属(耐药率为21.4%)、柠檬酸杆菌属(15.0%)、吲哚阳性变形杆菌属(6.0%)和沙雷菌属(9.7%)对头孢吡肟不耐药,且仅一株对亚胺培南耐药。亚胺培南通常对不动杆菌属和铜绿假单胞菌等非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌最有效。除头孢他啶(MIC90为12微克/毫升;药敏率为63.2 - 84.8%)外,所有测试的β-内酰胺类药物对苯唑西林敏感的葡萄球菌均有活性。总体活性谱(按耐药率排序)显示,亚胺培南(3.5%)>头孢吡肟(7.7%)>头孢匹罗(8.9%)>哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(13.2%)>头孢曲松(14.7%)>头孢他啶(16.9%)。在受监测的国家之间,耐药模式没有显著差异;这些结果表明,在马来西亚和新加坡,针对所研究的广谱β-内酰胺类药物,耐药率正在上升且有所增加。研究结果为未来在这些地理区域使用定量方法确定抗菌药物耐药性的研究提供了基准数据。