Birdwell B G, Raskob G E, Whitsett T L, Durica S S, Comp P C, George J N, Tytle T L, Owen W L, McKee P A
Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):309-13. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.3.309.
Compression ultrasonography has a high negative predictive value for deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Limited data are available on factors influencing positive predictive value. The objective of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value of compression ultrasonography according to the anatomic site of vein noncompressibility.
We performed a prospective cohort study of 756 consecutive outpatients with suspected first-episode deep vein thrombosis. Compression ultrasonography was performed at the initial visit: results were abnormal if a noncompressible segment was identified or normal if all segments were fully compressible. Venography was performed in patients with abnormal compression ultrasonography results. Positive predictive value was determined according to the site of noncompressibility: common femoral vein only, popliteal vein only, or both sites. Venography was the reference standard for the presence of deep vein thrombosis.
Positive predictive value was 16.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.4%-64.1%) for noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein compared with 91.3% (95% confidence interval, 72.0%-98.9%) for the popliteal vein only and 94.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.7%-99.9%) for both sites (P<.001). Of 15 patients with isolated noncompressibility of the common femoral vein, 8 (53%) had pelvic neoplasm or abscess compared with 2 (5%) of 42 with noncompressibility of the popliteal vein only and 6 (13%) of 47 with noncompressibility of both sites (P<.001).
The positive predictive value of noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein is too low to be used alone as the diagnostic end point for giving anticoagulant therapy. Noncompressibility isolated to the common femoral vein is a diagnostic marker for pelvic disease.
对于有症状的门诊患者,加压超声检查对深静脉血栓形成具有较高的阴性预测价值。关于影响阳性预测价值的因素,现有数据有限。本研究的目的是根据静脉不可压缩的解剖部位评估加压超声检查的阳性预测价值。
我们对756例连续的疑似首次发作深静脉血栓形成的门诊患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在初次就诊时进行加压超声检查:如果发现有不可压缩段,则结果异常;如果所有段均可完全压缩,则结果正常。对加压超声检查结果异常的患者进行静脉造影。根据不可压缩的部位确定阳性预测价值:仅股总静脉、仅腘静脉或两个部位均不可压缩。静脉造影是深静脉血栓形成存在与否的参考标准。
仅股总静脉不可压缩时的阳性预测价值为16.7%(95%置信区间,0.4%-64.1%),而仅腘静脉不可压缩时为91.3%(95%置信区间,72.0%-98.9%),两个部位均不可压缩时为94.4%(95%置信区间,72.7%-99.9%)(P<.001)。在15例仅股总静脉孤立性不可压缩的患者中,8例(53%)患有盆腔肿瘤或脓肿,而在42例仅腘静脉不可压缩的患者中有2例(5%),在47例两个部位均不可压缩的患者中有6例(13%)(P<.001)。
仅股总静脉不可压缩的阳性预测价值过低,不能单独用作给予抗凝治疗的诊断终点。仅股总静脉不可压缩是盆腔疾病的一个诊断标志物。