Rice J M, Wilbourn J D
Unit of Carcinogen Identification and Evaluation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Toxicol Pathol. 2000 Jan-Feb;28(1):202-14. doi: 10.1177/019262330002800125.
In the absence of adequate data on humans, it is biologically plausible and prudent to regard agents and mixtures for which there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals, usually rats and mice, as if they presented a carcinogenic risk to humans. Prediction of cancer sites in humans from bioassay data in rodents is much less certain, however, regardless of organ or tissue. For tumors of the nervous system, there is practically no basis for judging the validity of such predictions, as only ionizing radiation is known to cause tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in humans. Brain tumors are relatively uncommon findings in bioassays and are rare in untreated rodents, even in rats, which appear to be the most susceptible species. However, CNS tumors have been readily induced in rodents by systemic exposures to some chemicals, notably N-nitrosoalkylureas and other alkylating agents and certain alkyl hydrazine derivatives. CNS tumors in rodents have played a significant role in carcinogenic hazard evaluations of several other chemicals, including acrylonitrile, ethylene oxide, and acrylamide, and have been implicated as part of the tumor spectrum induced by vinyl chloride and certain inorganic lead compounds. In some of these evaluations, it is not certain that all tumors diagnosed as primary brain tumors were correctly identified. Diagnostic difficulties have been presented by undifferentiated small-cell tumors that may invade the brain, including carcinomas of the nasal cavity and undifferentiated schwannomas arising in cranial nerve ganglia, and by the difficulty of reliably distinguishing between focal reactive gliosis and early glial neoplasms. The most striking experimental finding regarding the induction by chemicals of tumors of the nervous system is the dramatically greater susceptibility of the fetal and neonatal nervous system to some carcinogens, as compared with the susceptibility of the nervous system in adults of the same species.
在缺乏关于人类的充分数据的情况下,将在实验动物(通常是大鼠和小鼠)中具有充分致癌证据的物质和混合物视为对人类具有致癌风险,从生物学角度来看是合理且谨慎的。然而,无论器官或组织如何,根据啮齿动物生物测定数据预测人类的癌症部位确定性要低得多。对于神经系统肿瘤,几乎没有依据来判断此类预测的有效性,因为已知只有电离辐射会导致人类中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤。脑肿瘤在生物测定中是相对不常见的发现,在未处理的啮齿动物中也很少见,即使在似乎最易感的大鼠中也是如此。然而,通过全身接触某些化学物质,特别是N - 亚硝基烷基脲和其他烷基化剂以及某些烷基肼衍生物,已很容易在啮齿动物中诱发中枢神经系统肿瘤。啮齿动物的中枢神经系统肿瘤在包括丙烯腈、环氧乙烷和丙烯酰胺在内的其他几种化学物质的致癌危害评估中发挥了重要作用,并且被认为是氯乙烯和某些无机铅化合物诱发的肿瘤谱的一部分。在其中一些评估中,不确定所有被诊断为原发性脑肿瘤的肿瘤是否都被正确识别。未分化的小细胞肿瘤可能侵犯大脑,包括鼻腔癌和颅神经节中出现的未分化神经鞘瘤,以及难以可靠地区分局灶性反应性胶质增生和早期胶质肿瘤,这些都带来了诊断困难。关于化学物质诱发神经系统肿瘤最显著的实验发现是,与同一物种成年动物的神经系统相比,胎儿和新生儿的神经系统对某些致癌物的易感性要高得多。