• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对某些肿瘤类型/部位进行折扣处理对实验动物致癌性评估的影响。

Effect of discounting certain tumor types/sites on evaluations of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals.

作者信息

Karstadt M, Haseman J K

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 1997 May;31(5):485-94. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199705)31:5<485::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-t.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199705)31:5<485::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-t
PMID:9099349
Abstract

It has been suggested that, for mechanistic reasons, certain tumors found in experimental animals should be discounted when evaluating carcinogenic effects. The questioned tumors are: mouse liver, rat thyroid follicular cell, bladder and kidney (male rat), forestomach (mouse and rat, gavage route), and lung (mouse and rat, inhalation of particles). We sought to determine the effects of discounting those tumors on classification of chemicals as carcinogens in animals. We looked at carcinogenicity data for chemicals studied in NCI-NTP bioassays and/or reviewed in IARC monographs and we found that deleting the questioned tumors would have significant impact on evaluations of carcinogenicity in animals. Fifty-six of 234 (24%) chemicals determined to be carcinogenic in the NCI-NTP bioassay program would no longer be considered carcinogenic: 102 (44%) would have weaker evidence of carcinogenic effects. Thirty-three of 361 (9%) chemicals determined by IARC to have "limited" or "sufficient" evidence of carcinogenicity would no longer be considered carcinogenic; 119 (33%) would have weaker evidence of carcinogenic effects. Because such a large number of chemicals currently considered carcinogenic would be affected by categorical deletion of tumors and because we are not aware of data that would justify such categorical deletions, it would be preferable to consider mechanistic justifications for discounting tumors on a case-by-case basis for each individual chemical. Deletion of tumors on a categorical basis has serious implications for regulation of toxic chemicals and for public health.

摘要

有人提出,出于机制方面的原因,在评估致癌作用时,实验动物身上发现的某些肿瘤应不予考虑。受到质疑的肿瘤包括:小鼠肝脏、大鼠甲状腺滤泡细胞、膀胱和肾脏(雄性大鼠)、前胃(小鼠和大鼠,灌胃途径)以及肺(小鼠和大鼠,吸入颗粒物)。我们试图确定不考虑这些肿瘤对化学品在动物体内致癌性分类的影响。我们查看了在NCI-NTP生物测定中研究和/或在IARC专论中审查的化学品的致癌性数据,发现删除这些受到质疑的肿瘤将对动物致癌性评估产生重大影响。在NCI-NTP生物测定项目中被确定为致癌的234种化学品中,有56种(24%)将不再被视为致癌物:102种(44%)的致癌作用证据将减弱。在IARC确定具有“有限”或“充分”致癌证据的361种化学品中,有33种(9%)将不再被视为致癌物;119种(33%)的致癌作用证据将减弱。由于目前被视为致癌物的大量化学品会受到肿瘤分类删除的影响,而且我们不知道有哪些数据可以证明这种分类删除是合理的,因此最好针对每种化学品逐一考虑基于机制的理由来不考虑某些肿瘤。按类别删除肿瘤对有毒化学品的监管和公众健康具有严重影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of discounting certain tumor types/sites on evaluations of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals.对某些肿瘤类型/部位进行折扣处理对实验动物致癌性评估的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 1997 May;31(5):485-94. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199705)31:5<485::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-t.
2
Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?长期生物测定得出的肿瘤发生率能告诉我们关于致癌物我们需要了解的信息吗?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;41(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.11.001. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
3
The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.致癌生物测定的前景:在识别人类癌症风险中的应用。
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Jul-Aug;103(7-8):680-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103680.
4
Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.小鼠特异性致癌物:对转基因小鼠短期致癌性生物测定验证的危害及意义评估
Hum Exp Toxicol. 1998 Apr;17(4):193-205. doi: 10.1177/096032719801700401.
5
Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.评价终生动物致癌试验在鉴定人类癌症危险度中的效用。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
6
Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.用于鉴定潜在人类致癌物的双物种生物测定法的替代方法。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996 Mar;15(3):183-202. doi: 10.1177/096032719601500301.
7
[Identification of human carcinogenic risks in IARC monographs].[国际癌症研究机构专论中人类致癌风险的识别]
Bull Cancer. 1995;82(5):339-48.
8
Chemicals classified by IARC: their potency in tests for carcinogenicity in rodents and their genotoxicity and acute toxicity.国际癌症研究机构(IARC)分类的化学物质:它们在啮齿动物致癌性试验中的效力及其遗传毒性和急性毒性。
IARC Sci Publ. 1992(116):323-52.
9
Carcinogenesis bioassays: study duration and biological relevance.致癌生物测定:研究持续时间与生物学相关性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2001 Jul;39(7):739-44. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00010-2.
10
Comparative carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and chloroprene in rats and mice.1,3 - 丁二烯、异戊二烯和氯丁二烯在大鼠和小鼠中的比较致癌性。
Chem Biol Interact. 2001 Jun 1;135-136:27-42. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(01)00213-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of transgenic mouse models in carcinogen identification.转基因小鼠模型在致癌物鉴定中的作用。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):444-54. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5778.
2
Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.职业性癌症研究方法的发展重点。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jan;111(1):1-12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.111-1241299.